The Hugo packet is out and voting is open (I continue to be so impressed with how on-the-ball Dublin is, after San Jose. Also, I really like this voting interface -- it's so much more intuitive and user friendly!) Anyway, that seems like a good time to do a delayed (and paltry) reading roundup:
12. Paper Girls, vol 5, (Brian K Vaughan, art by
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
Reply
I do, heh. And, yeah, I recognize that the comics are the "real" canon, but I definitely prefer MCU.
"What 'What now?' You got a character, that's it."
Hm, interesting! I don't feel that I've tried enough superhero comics to come to any conclusion, besides that they are not my thing, but I think you're right about certain genres "prioritizing" certain elements of the story. Although a sci-fi story that has only ideas and no character draw is unlikely to work for me except maybe in very short format, same with fantasy settings. And may explain why I like things like fantasy/sci-fi police procedurals a lot -- because they've got to have at least TWO things, being a genre mashup :P
and it does seem to be on the realistic-ish side instead of the mwahahing overlordy tackyness for 8yoOne word of warning about Abbott realisticness -- there is a central "good vs evil" / light vs dark thing going in the cosmography, which didn't bother me, because I ( ... )
Reply
With the aforementioned friend we use a term "local canon", so we no longer bother with deciding which canon is the canon in fandoms/franchises like this. All of them are, this way. :D That is, some are primary and there's a line of inspiration, of course, not to mention some are more or less popular/influential, but such differences aside, all local canons are essentially equal.
I don't feel that I've tried enough superhero comics to come to any conclusion
As I see it, my theory applies to the genre in all media, not just comics. MCU movies also seem to work like this, to a degree.
Although a sci-fi story that has only ideas and no character draw is unlikely to work for me except maybe in very short format, same with fantasy settings.
Most certainly, same here. That is, I can appreciate them on the intellectual level, but it's not enough to love them; it'll stay impersonal. And I like genre-mongrels as well. Especially crime plots in less common settings ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I really liked the way the gods worked in this book--it was definitely a different worldbuilding. I also noticed and appreciated how consistent the Xulahn's grammar mistakes were!
I liked the way the very non-linear storytelling with an obscured role for the primary narrator makes the story hang together and then unfold. That was definitely the best thing about the book for me! I ( ... )
Reply
I'm impressed by how many people seem to agree on this, considering that the protagonist of those is a rock that doesn't move anywhere or do much of anything XP
It's like the character is just sort of there just for the purpose of having someone to address/using second person.
Yeah... I can't really think of a purpose beyond that.
I also noticed and appreciated how consistent the Xulahn's grammar mistakes were!
Oh, cool! My co-reader found the grammar mistakes annoying while I was geeking out about them, so I'm glad to hear I was not alone in this :)
Not my favorite Leckie either -- that would be probably Provenance, followed by Ancillary Sword (which, I clearly prefer her doing smaller, character-focused stories with families and a lot of comedy; so it's probably not surprising Raven Tower isn't one of those favorites, though I do appreciate what it's doing, and how.)
Reply
Haha, so true! Now that I think about it, maybe it's that the rock has more personality than the other characters, somehow. XD
I loved Provenance too! She is very good at comedy. I think Ancillary Justice might still be my favorite though. She's definitely an author to watch.
Reply
That's true, actually, haha. I mean, it's not a totally fair comparison, because the rock IS the narrator, after all, in everything we know about everyone else is inferred by the rock, but still. Like, Mawat and Eolo and Tikaz have personality traits, but they tend to be fairly one-note: Eolo is competent and steady, Mawat has a temper and is stubborn, Tikaz is... also stubborn, I guess? and sharp-tongued.
She is very good at comedy.
She is! And distinctly non-human characters. And especially comedy involving distinctly non-human characters, like the Translators in the Ancillary books or the Geck ambassador in Provenance. I really missed that here!
Reply
Reply
Happy belated Mother's Day! Hope you and the family were able to celebrate
Reply
We had a lovely celebration in our own, odd little way, lol!
Reply
We celebrated, too, with family, which is the important thing.
Reply
Tea Master & The Detective sort of left me feeling "Well, this was certainly a book and I have now read this book" It was...nice but like you I felt that with that premise I should have loved it. If she ever writes another book about those characters I will probably give it a try once it's on sale but it didn't make me want to check out the rest of that universe
Reply
If she ever writes another book about those characters I will probably give it a try once it's on sale but it didn't make me want to check out the rest of ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment