I seem to have gotten my reading mojo back, after a slow year in 2013, which means both that I'm reading more (at the expense of LJ time, unfortunately), and want to talk about books more than I've recently wanted.
4. Mike Carey, The Devil You Know (Felix Castor #1) -- this is another one of the urban fantasy madness recs from December, and I've
(
Read more... )
Comments 39
Reply
I'm glad I was not the only one who had trouble believing Seraphina was sixteen. I mean, some of the narration could be from the older version of the character recounting the events, but she didn't seem sixteen in her actions and dialogue and the way people were relating to her, either, so I concluded it wasn't that.
What did you think about the mathematical-minded dragons, btw?
Reply
I liked the dragons! They're so serious and logical and I really like characters who have a hard time understanding social norms and ~how to be a person. I liked Eskar a lot especially.
Reply
Me too! Those conversations and scenes between the dragons and the human characters were probably my favorite thing about the book!
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Glad to hear you're another fan of her work/LJ! :)
Reply
nice language, nice plot, but just... not working for me. i've chalked it up to my general meh about urban fantasy noir, but maybe it's just the style itself, i don't know.
(and aaaaaaaaaaagh the russianfail, i know, i know. THE NAMES, THEY BURN US, PRECIOUSSS).
Reply
I suspect these books skew more noir than most urban fantasy books, including UF books that are trying to be noir, and that's part of what's not working for me particularly well. Nice language, nice plot, yes... but not really grabbing me beyond that. I expect I will try #3 at some point and see what happens, but it's definitely not a new favorite series...
Reply
and i'm like, ooooooooooooooooh man.
the only uf noir thing that worked for me is kate daniels series, and it's because it's actively moving from noir setup to friends-and-family-and-support-network setup.
(i was also hella impressed by russian phrases and mythological allusions in this book, right until i've discovered that the write is actually a husband-wife team and wife is russian. like, OF COURSE :D)
Reply
XD I remember seeing this phrase on my flist, either from you or someone else. That is rather impressive. (WHY. Why do people insist on making characters of background they know nothing about and not bothering to run it by someone who knows these things...)
I've heard good things about the Kate Daniels series, from sarahtales and other places, and the loner --> support network progression is the thing that makes me want to check it out. And, ooh, I didn't realize Ilona Andrews was a) not a single person and b) of Russian extraction -- that makes me more curious to check out their stuff.
Reply
And I had the same reaction to Carey in reading the first and wanting to go on to the second, and reading the second and wanting to stop.
Reply
Interesting re: Carey! I saw that you had posted after finishing two books, but wasn't sure if you were still reading. I guess it could be just the fairly typical second-book slump, so I'm not writing off the series entirely -- it wouldn't surprise me if I went back to it after RoL #5 leaves me craving more London fantasy...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment