For the December ramble meme, Day 27,
egelantier asked me to ramble about Volha, but I first needed to get my book thoughts down in more usual manner, and as I try to go in chronological order with the books, I should also post my last Reading Roundup of the year. I made it to 50, just barely... but hey, for a while it looked like even that might not happen
(
Read more... )
Comments 36
I found the writing style interesting and refreshing at first, but that changed about halfway through the book, when I got fed up with Christopher. I found him a completely unsympathetic protagonist because his disregard for other people is just astounding, and in no way do I believe that someone on the autistic spectrum who is relatively integrated into neurotypical society can be so selfish and unable to care about the effects his actions have on other people-that seems more like a sociopath to me. So, as soon as I stopped caring about Christopher, I stopped caring about the book, and the second half was just tedious and full of ugh. (Not to mention the author using the narrator to ~espouse his own views on religion. Ugh, just no.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
That is very neat to know, so thank you for sharing that insight!
They... made it into a play? O.o That seems like it would be difficult, given how much of the book, and its strength, is Christopher's internal monologue...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
i think a lot of my love for volha is that she was literally the first heroine of this kind in russian fantasy market (and ikel89 is absolutely correct, it immediately created a TON of completely godawful epigons, that i thankfully haven't read), and i immediately fell in love with her voice. the whole shtick with humorous ladyfantasy in first pov is insanely tough to pull off, step to the left and you're in marysueish chicklit, step to the right and you're in marysueish tough chick with tragic past land, and volha is all and neither. i really, really loved - and you're right, it's very, and probably intentionally, reminiscent of pratchett - the juxtaposition of humorous setting and live breathing characters with actual stories to tell ( ... )
Reply
the whole shtick with humorous ladyfantasy in first pov is insanely tough to pull off, step to the left and you're in marysueish chicklit, step to the right and you're in marysueish tough chick with tragic past land, and volha is all and neitherI really agree with this point, and am impressed with how well Volha as a character and Gromyko as an author negotiate this line. I have read a fair bit of western fantasy (mostly urban, but some second-world as well) with female protagonists (let's say Toby Daye, Rachel Morgan, Sookie Stackhouse, Marla Mason, Kaylin Neya, though there are doubtless others I'm not thinking of atm) and I don't think I can think of one that navigates this line better than Volha. Though, I don't think she really needs the tragic past -- her grounding in her work served better ( ... )
Reply
the only thing i strenuously anti-rec is 'plus na minus', which is just - honestly, i blame ulanov for this one. it reeks of, like, this specific genre of dude wish-fullfillment shtick, and i don't remember details, but it just enraged and annoyed me when i read it.
my personal gromyko preference order is vv - volha - kamaleynik - cosmopeople, i think.
Reply
I was super-not-impressed by what I perceive to be Ulanov's contributions to the first Kosmo~oluhi book (based on the characters he was writing and the fact that I liked solo-authored book 2 more), so "+/-" was at the bottom of the list, and with your anti-rec I simply won't bother with it.
But it's good to hear that you liked Kamaleynik! I was curious about it based on the fanart-y things that had popped up in Fandom Battle and Volha Konkurs and so on. Maybe I'll read that one next...
Reply
Reply
That's pretty much how I felt about it, too. But the premise IS really cool!
I want one, and I *hate* spiders.
Haha, AWW!
I don't find Isaac interesting either, and, yeah, now that you mention it, he is rather "generic urban fantasy protagonist", isn't he...
but right now it still feels a little too much like fanservice
Lena is such a weird case! Because on the one hand I do feel like Hines is trying to show how creepy such fanservice-y characters are. But on the other hand, she does still feel vaguely fan-service-y, and she's the love interest, and I feel like the book is still, perhaps inadvertently, capitalizing on the squicky fanservice even while trying to lampshade it or deconstruct it or whatever...
kudos to JCH, I guess, for being slightly less skeevy than I expected?
I do think, from reading his blog and stuff, that he's a really good guy trying to do the right thing. He's the one doing those poses of female characters on covers that you ( ... )
Reply
Oh, he's that guy! :D In that case, yeah, I'm much more inclined to see the whole Lena situation as attempting to have one's cheesecake and thematically analyze eat it too, rather than just pulling a Jim-Butcher-at-his-worst.
Actually, perusing his blog, I agree more and more with what you said above - he actually does sound like a rather erudite and thoughtful dude, especially re: fanservice, the male gaze, etc.! I mean, he's clearly thought about all the issues he brings up in Libriomancer a good deal... I guess I just wish the execution could be a little better in this case. XD
Reply
Heh, great turn of phrase!
And, yeah, that's my conclusion as well, both about intent and about execution...
Reply
Leave a comment