It occurs to me to wonder about Ender. His earliest triumph over his peers is his laugh as perspective-reversal. Card continues to emphasize how important it is that Ender realizes that up and down are arbitrary and, hence, chooses the most useful orientation. It seems significant to me that here, at least, he retains up and down--but he possesses the ability to immediately reorient when the older frame of reference proves less useful.
While I readily acknowledge how quickly the usefulness of up and down breaks up when anything becomes large, I think one shouldn't ignore how useful they are locally. No plane of orientation affects our immediate experience so much as that fundamental pull DOWN.
I'm not sure about outward and inward. My first impression is that it's too vague, too three-dimensional. Away/toward. From/to. Hm.
You might get a kick out of reading Oliver Sacks. I believe in one of his books he deals with a man who has lost (or damaged?) part of his brain and loses sense of "up and down". Loved Ender's Game, some of the rest in the series didn't do it for me. Also would be interested in hearing more about your readings in kabbalah. I've perused the subject but haven't delved too deeply into it (visiting the Kabbalah Center in west Los Angeles = big turn off.)
Comments 2
While I readily acknowledge how quickly the usefulness of up and down breaks up when anything becomes large, I think one shouldn't ignore how useful they are locally. No plane of orientation affects our immediate experience so much as that fundamental pull DOWN.
I'm not sure about outward and inward. My first impression is that it's too vague, too three-dimensional. Away/toward. From/to. Hm.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment