You could create judge-bots that simply parrot the judgements of prediction markets. I suspect that their reputations would eventually get pretty high.
Huemer's arguments on values are incorrect. The real basis of his views are, "people are stupid and inconsistent." He's package dealing -- it's entirely possible to be inconsistent and not stupid. Why? Because I feel like it.
individuals derive psychological rewards from holding certain political beliefs, and since each individual suffers almost none of the harm caused by his own false political beliefs, it often makes sense (it gives him what he wants) to adopt those beliefs regardless of whether they are true or well-supported.
I think this is right on the mark. I was thinking that capitalists (or rather corporatists) lie about the benefits of policy to get what they want. But putting it your way is both more general and explains even more behaviour.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
But I really like his exposition of how self-deception works.
Reply
individuals derive psychological rewards from holding certain political beliefs, and since each individual suffers almost none of the harm caused by his own false political beliefs, it often makes sense (it gives him what he wants) to adopt those beliefs regardless of whether they are true or well-supported.
I think this is right on the mark. I was thinking that capitalists (or rather corporatists) lie about the benefits of policy to get what they want. But putting it your way is both more general and explains even more behaviour.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment