Not that many of you weren't aware of it already, but it's a good article to read anyway. The go-to people for the "bigotry" side that's apparently required to be included so as not to make the writer look "prejudiced" or something give their take, too. It strikes me as funny that news organizations today still feel the need to get this side of
(
Read more... )
Comments 2
As for the rest of the article, I'm kind of confused because the amount of gayness on tv and in movies has actually backslid the last couple years, but hey. It's a big paper and you need to fill it somehow, right?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment