Kiernan imbues the tales with disquieting gothic imagery and envelops them in rich, evocative prose that conveys cohesiveness beyond their fragmentary plots.
That looks like a pretty good review to me. Congratulations.
That was my trouble with the entire review, when I put it under a magnifying glass: long words, little said.
I don't consider it a great critical analysis. I do consider it positive, meaning that with any luck it will encourage people to buy copies of Alabaster and enjoy the stories in greater depth than this gloss provides. Which is, I think, all that a Publisher's Weekly review is supposed to do.
Similarly, "rich evocative prose" is a rubbish phrase, full of useless odds and ends that should be thrown out.
There's only three words in that phrase: you wouldn't have much left when you were done. Or with what would you replace it?
Also, how exactly does Kiernan's prose compensate for fragmented plots? (Which is how I parse that sentence.) I don't parse it as compensation-"rich, evocative prose that conveys cohesiveness beyond their fragmentary plots." Without making too much of this one sentence, I took it rather as a suggestion that the story exists more in the language and the atmosphere than in the actions. Which may not be not
( ... )
Hemingway FiltermackatlawJune 23 2006, 19:25:31 UTC
Allow me to run this review through my “Hemingway Filter” and turn it into newspaper style, with shorter words, concrete nouns, and action verbs. See what you think
( ... )
Comments 8
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055471/locations
Reply
That looks like a pretty good review to me. Congratulations.
Reply
Similarly, "rich evocative prose" is a rubbish phrase, full of useless odds and ends that should be thrown out.
Also, how exactly does Kiernan's prose compensate for fragmented plots? (Which is how I parse that sentence.)
That was my trouble with the entire review, when I put it under a magnifying glass: long words, little said.
Mack
Reply
I don't consider it a great critical analysis. I do consider it positive, meaning that with any luck it will encourage people to buy copies of Alabaster and enjoy the stories in greater depth than this gloss provides. Which is, I think, all that a Publisher's Weekly review is supposed to do.
Similarly, "rich evocative prose" is a rubbish phrase, full of useless odds and ends that should be thrown out.
There's only three words in that phrase: you wouldn't have much left when you were done. Or with what would you replace it?
Also, how exactly does Kiernan's prose compensate for fragmented plots? (Which is how I parse that sentence.) I don't parse it as compensation-"rich, evocative prose that conveys cohesiveness beyond their fragmentary plots." Without making too much of this one sentence, I took it rather as a suggestion that the story exists more in the language and the atmosphere than in the actions. Which may not be not ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I trust your taste tho.
Congrats on the review!
Reply
Reply
"patrons in monster-slaying"
But you got the idea and amusement, I hope.
Reply
Leave a comment