Howard Hughes Gets Her Second Wind. (Part Two)

Jun 23, 2006 00:37

Er...yeah. So. Anyway. There's also a pretty good review of Alabaster out from Publisher's Weekly. I quote:

ALABASTERCaitlí­n R. Kiernan. Subterranean (www.subterraneanpress.com), $25 (160p) ISBN 1-59606-060-3 ( Read more... )

pw, wordsworth, reviews, awards, skin, dancy, splendour in the grass

Leave a comment

Comments 8

blakesrealm June 23 2006, 08:26:34 UTC
Here are the locations that IMDB associates with the film, perhaps High Falls, NY?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055471/locations

Reply


sovay June 23 2006, 15:02:25 UTC
Kiernan imbues the tales with disquieting gothic imagery and envelops them in rich, evocative prose that conveys cohesiveness beyond their fragmentary plots.

That looks like a pretty good review to me. Congratulations.

Reply

Review mackatlaw June 23 2006, 20:23:04 UTC
Yeah, but it's so vague as to be almost useless. We can tell the review liked it. But what sort of "disquieting gothic imagery"? Details, please!

Similarly, "rich evocative prose" is a rubbish phrase, full of useless odds and ends that should be thrown out.

Also, how exactly does Kiernan's prose compensate for fragmented plots? (Which is how I parse that sentence.)

That was my trouble with the entire review, when I put it under a magnifying glass: long words, little said.

Mack

Reply

sovay June 23 2006, 20:54:36 UTC
That was my trouble with the entire review, when I put it under a magnifying glass: long words, little said.

I don't consider it a great critical analysis. I do consider it positive, meaning that with any luck it will encourage people to buy copies of Alabaster and enjoy the stories in greater depth than this gloss provides. Which is, I think, all that a Publisher's Weekly review is supposed to do.

Similarly, "rich evocative prose" is a rubbish phrase, full of useless odds and ends that should be thrown out.

There's only three words in that phrase: you wouldn't have much left when you were done. Or with what would you replace it?

Also, how exactly does Kiernan's prose compensate for fragmented plots? (Which is how I parse that sentence.) I don't parse it as compensation-"rich, evocative prose that conveys cohesiveness beyond their fragmentary plots." Without making too much of this one sentence, I took it rather as a suggestion that the story exists more in the language and the atmosphere than in the actions. Which may not be not ( ... )

Reply

Review Parsing mackatlaw June 28 2006, 20:00:42 UTC
“Which is, I think, all that a Publisher's Weekly review is supposed to do ( ... )

Reply


sfmarty June 23 2006, 16:34:43 UTC
Sometimes I wish you would stop mentioning good films to me. My Netflix list is soooo long!

I trust your taste tho.

Congrats on the review!

Reply


Hemingway Filter mackatlaw June 23 2006, 19:25:31 UTC
Allow me to run this review through my “Hemingway Filter” and turn it into newspaper style, with shorter words, concrete nouns, and action verbs. See what you think ( ... )

Reply


Edit: typographical errors mackatlaw June 23 2006, 20:20:29 UTC
"should have been discussed"

"patrons in monster-slaying"

But you got the idea and amusement, I hope.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up