Buffy in the New York Times

May 18, 2003 17:22


Yep, I'm a dork and I can't help taking notes on stuff that interests me. (I submit, as further evidence, Exhibit B: The Langoliers, based on a recent rereading of that Stephen King novella (Four Past Midnight was just sitting there in the laundry room, ripe for the borrowing!)

Anyway, I'll just put these behind cut tags, since they're mostly for ( Read more... )

atheism, links, books, family, literature, good quotes, religion, reading, buffy, bibliography, geekery

Leave a comment

Comments 1

(The comment has been removed)

Dude. goteam May 21 2003, 15:40:58 UTC
I think a major part of my problem in that class was that the teacher started out with the assumption that we all had some (probably Judeo-Christian) definition of sin and redemption. I didn't. I was raised knowing that religion was something other people did, but not me and my family, and that mythology is awesome reading, but I never got into dogma past hearing an occasional sermon at a friend's brother's baptism or something like that. So I guess simple, basic definitions would be the place for me to start. I remember being really frustrated by the question "Is Reverend Dimmesdale redeemed for his sins?" because I didn't even really know what it meant. Sigh. Email would probably be a better venue for continuing this discussion, eh?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up