Leave a comment

Comments 26

rexluscus January 9 2008, 00:18:29 UTC
WOW. O_o

Reply

gnatkip January 9 2008, 01:37:26 UTC
Hee, yay! :)

Reply


aubrem January 9 2008, 00:55:15 UTC
wow!

Reply

gnatkip January 9 2008, 01:37:58 UTC
:D Hi.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

gnatkip January 9 2008, 01:40:54 UTC
Thank you, JC!

Reply


la_fono January 9 2008, 01:23:56 UTC
Distilled essentials. LOVE.

More to come, had to declare keymash before fell sleep, could not wait till morning :D

a;lkdfjsal'sdjfg

Reply

gnatkip January 9 2008, 01:41:40 UTC
Thingness of dragon. <3

Reply

la_fono January 10 2008, 02:09:44 UTC
Omg, yes, so very much so!

I really enjoyed reading the printer's POV of Picasso's process. It was a little sad how he/they did completely NOT GET IT. His last iteration screams "BULL", even if one hadn't seen the previous versions, all in nine lines. *.*

Did you do them in the same order that he did? It's so interesting, from a process point of view - both his and your process is laid out in sequence, but each drawing has it's own process as well. Process onion!

I think my favourite one has to be number nine, for the beautifully confident neck-back-tail line that rebounds so deliciously into the flame-shape on the end of his tail.

Reply

gnatkip January 10 2008, 02:40:46 UTC
NOM! And NOM AGAIN!

I thought the printer's POV was really interesting as well. I do wonder why the head wasted away. For me, the thingness of a bull is mostly the head.

I did do them in his order, yes! I kept wanting to skip ahead, but I held back, because I didn't know what the end should be, if I didn't do the work to get there. I wonder how it would've been different if I'd drawn the last one first... probably quite a bit different, probably more angular; maybe better, I don't know. I really enjoyed it, though! Figuring out what was essential and what could go.

Nine is missing hir tiny little T-Rex arms! XD

*hearts processtalk with you*

Reply


ileliberte January 9 2008, 03:50:07 UTC
Your work is always so interesting and well thought out. I really like this.

Reply

gnatkip January 10 2008, 00:49:19 UTC
*clings* Thank you! :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up