(Untitled)

Sep 21, 2007 11:11

Last night, I started writing another response in a short conversation I’ve been having with belledezuylen about Canticle for Liebowitz in quirkychipmunk’s comment section, but soon my thinking wandered off and seemed rather too much to put in such a comment, so I’m posting it my journal instead. This quite long and mostly just thinking, so if that ( Read more... )

poetry and paradigms, academia!, loss, time

Leave a comment

Comments 3

belledezuylen September 21 2007, 16:24:32 UTC
This is a brilliant post, and I have so much to say in response that I may end up posting an entry of my own. I agree that we are primarily historical animals, but that some instinct makes us maddeningly ahistorical at times--we learn lessons, but fail to live by them; we forget how to mourn. Hume proves, almost incontrovertibly, that nothing can possibly exist, but ends his discussion with a caveat: despite the nebulous nature of the world around us, he writes, we have some emotional or intellectual limitation that forces us to live as if the world really did exist, to develop a deliberate blindness to the real nature of things. In the same way, perhaps, those in power are genuinely incapable of learning from their mistakes, and the public at large would rather push forward than mourn what is gone ( ... )

Reply

glasere_rev September 21 2007, 20:15:57 UTC
I really want to respond properly and have this conversation. I've got to go get e_4 now and I might not be online properly till I'm home and he's back at work (about four days) but I'm not disappearing because I don't want to talk--because I do.

Reply


olivia_circe October 7 2007, 22:35:30 UTC
Oh.

Yes. I - yes. I'll write to you, because there is, I think, too much to say.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up