(Untitled)

[glance_inward]

See the camel. Love the camel. Be the camel's shadow.

All hail National Geographic.

Comments

Camel? I think not!

[surabaya]

You should have a picture of monkey. I think you could become a more self fullfilled person if you had a monkey photo instead.

It could even be....wait for it.... A Psychiatrist Monkey, working to rehabiliate the previously socially isolated monkey.

Re: Camel? I think not!

[glance_inward]

Not psychiatrist monkey. A therapist monkey. Get it straight. And I'll ask my prof if he has a non-overhead picture of the monkies in question. Ten-year-old overheads probably don't look so hot on the net...

[thefigments]

That pic is superb!

[glance_inward]

Thank you! Mostly it was to taunt my sister, since she loves camels too, but I've decided to adpot him (her? Too hard to tell from above) for my own. Maybe in a few weeks I'll bust out the other pilfered National Geographic image I pilfered (that one's a baby owl).

[surabaya]

Well mon singe, I must inquire as to what has become of your Copy Editor's Pride? Using "pilfered" twice in the same sentence... it's shameful really.

I'll call Matt and have you kicked off the Omega... Although, in all truth, you really should have been kicked off years ago, what with that "BS" article you named...

[glance_inward]

The BS wasn't that bad... you should have heard some of the story names Matt has come up with. And the way I have "pilfered" twice isn't incorrect, just... stylisticly disadvantaged. Just like how you're not incorrect, just modesty disadvantaged.