ETA: I can at least embed the YouTube video I talked about in the essay.
Click to view
I submitted two essays at the end of April; we are told to expect a three-week wait for the results in the case of shorter essays, four for the 'full-length', 4,000-word pieces.
I was a little surprised, therefore, to get the results for my shorter piece yesterday. (
Modesty makes me hide the rest under the cut, including the actual essay. )
Comments 13
I enjoyed reading your essay. If only recordings existed of the production so that we could find out for ourselves how bad it was!
Personally, I consider an accusation of "high journalism" a compliment! :)
Reply
It's worth searching for it on YouTube if you're interested - the clips do suggest sub-amateur standard.
Thanks - I'm glad you enjoyed reading it!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Stacey
Reply
Reply
The stilted speech is interesting. The stylistic changes in broadcasting over the last 35 years have been huge so interviews from 1980 might easily sound more stilted to us now than they would have done then.
Congrats on such a good mark and such an interesting essay.
Reply
The sources are all incredibly biased - and virtually all, even the most academic, are trying to get a laugh as much as anything else.
Reply
I got accused of 'intellectualism' for the quote in Anglo Saxon in the poem I posted yesterday.
Yup! That was the whole point, you see! :o)
Reply
What is wrong with either 'high journalism' or 'intellectualism' anyway? We're geeks and proud of it.
Reply
Reply
It's my favourite A/S poem, I must say. Yes, I did recognise the reference, come to think of it.
Reply
Leave a comment