That's a hard one, because it does have a lot going for it. If someone didn't feel bogged down at the beginning (and that can be totally a person's point of view,) and wasn't one who insisted on an ending that ties up all the plot points, than, yeah, I could see some people really liking the book. And going by Goodreads, there are. But those were two sticking points for me.
Thanks! I'll think about it - I will often surrender if a book is too slow at the beginning unless it's also REALLY well written - it was that alone which got me through Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, which was worth the effort (and it was an effort) - but it sounds like it might be worth it.
Oddly enough, I'm not at all surprised it was the lighthouse keepers of the past who managed the situation better than the researchers of the present. I personally would have been surprised, had it been the other way around.
It's a shame it began so slowly and ended in an unresolved way, as it sounds like a very interesting book. One I probably would have tried. I like that kind of mystery.
The lighthouse keepers, especially the oldest one, was more familiar with the strange things that can happen at sea (though nothing this strange!) And coming from a time that still took a lot on faith, it did make more sense for them to be able to handle the situation better.
I do, too. And you may find that those two points might not be such a problem for you. You may not think the beginning too slow, and be satisfied with the ending. Quite a few people on Goodreads felt that way.
I have now d/l'd a sample; so I'll find out if the beginning it too slow or not. If it isn't and I enjoy it then I'll get the book. As you say we all differ in what makes a book work for us - and I've found that I can be satisfied and unsatisfied with in effect the same thing in different books.
That does sound good. I love isolated mystery/horror books. With these type of "unsolved" horror books I think it's how the author ends the book that really make or break if it works or not.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Thanks! I'll think about it - I will often surrender if a book is too slow at the beginning unless it's also REALLY well written - it was that alone which got me through Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, which was worth the effort (and it was an effort) - but it sounds like it might be worth it.
Reply
Reply
It's a shame it began so slowly and ended in an unresolved way, as it sounds like a very interesting book. One I probably would have tried. I like that kind of mystery.
Reply
I do, too. And you may find that those two points might not be such a problem for you. You may not think the beginning too slow, and be satisfied with the ending. Quite a few people on Goodreads felt that way.
Reply
I have now d/l'd a sample; so I'll find out if the beginning it too slow or not. If it isn't and I enjoy it then I'll get the book. As you say we all differ in what makes a book work for us - and I've found that I can be satisfied and unsatisfied with in effect the same thing in different books.
Reply
Reply
Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment