So I'm studying for my Chinese midterm when I suddenly find myself getting really, really fed up with the dry writing style of Sources of Ancient Chinese Philosophy. This snarky little voice in my head starts making all sorts of little comments and, rather than have them come out in, oh, say, my actual midterm, I decided to type it up
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
-Meredith
Reply
So yeah, two hundred years ain't really history, not in the grand scheme of things...
I'm sure you've encountered the difficulty in explaining time to John Q. Public, for whom what he ate for lunch last Thursday is history. I had a prof once who had a great line: "Urbanization is an experiment for humanity. It hasn't run long enough to know if it's for real or a flash in the pan."
(Another thing archaeologists and anthropologists love to do is assign a Deep Philosophical Meaning to random squiggles. But hey, everyone needs a hobby.)
Gods, yes. And when it's something seemingly inexplicable, describe it as "religious or ceremonial." Tag assigned, case closed.
in the minds of anthropologists who, as I've mentioned, are just mad about finding new old things to name*nods* Oh yeah. Absolutely. Mmmm-hmmmm ( ... )
Reply
You're absolutely right about John Q. Public and time. Some of the things people call 'historic' would make me laugh if it wasn't so bloody insane.
And wow, you learned something, too! ^__^ Who'da thought? ^_~
Thanks again,
-Meredith
Reply
Leave a comment