second.

[emergens]

[anonymous ; text ; untraceable]

Refugees from countless worlds, some unknown amount of parallel universes. Detachment of planets from stars, detachment of stars from galaxies and yet organic life continues

Comments

[Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

We are just very stubborn.

If you want a more logical and literal answer to your question, however, most refugees are humans because most worlds destroyed were human worlds.

[Text || Anon]

[emergens]

Then either humanity colonized the most worlds, or was specifically targeted.

[Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

As much I'd like to give that much credit to the species, colonizing so many worlds, when most human planets were clearly not enough advanced to do so, sounds strange.

Most of those worlds have the same evolution theory and history, you see.

[Text || Anon]

[emergens]

Repeated instances of 'earth' of roughly the same background have mentioned along the network.

Humanity attracts strange attention to itself.

[Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

The existence of multiple "Earths" would be it. Planets that seem exact copies, and the only variants are the people in it. Same continents, same oceans, same countries, same background, same history, same cultures. Sometimes, even same historical personalities.

But the fun does not end there; some of the refugees that live on the Thor "came" from Human mind. Cartoons, books, games. Talking to a character from books you've read when you were a child is something else.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[emergens]

Humans that are the fictional creations of other humans. This ship is more unusual than initially anticipated.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

That doesn't happen only on this ship.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[emergens]

Clarification: it was not expected that fiction were to become reality in such a way. We are aware that humans will frequently create stories in which to live vicariously through other, imagined humans.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

I got that.

It's one of Thor's perks. There are many.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[emergens]

You would consider this a positive development?

Re: [Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

In comparison to what?

[Text || Anon]

[emergens]

That is the question directed at you. You called it a 'perk'. This implies it is relatively desirable outcome.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

Not if I used the word as sarcasm.

[Text || Anon]

[emergens]

[A pause.]

Sarcasm is a strange social construct.

[Text || Anon]

[chocogun]

Not many understand it.

Re: [Text || Anon]

[emergens]

It is counterintuitive to sharing information.