"Baker Street 5: A Meal at a Long Table"

Feb 05, 2010 22:25

Title: "Baker Street 5: A Meal at a Long Table."
Author: Gaedhal
Pairing/Characters: Sherlock Holmes/Dr. John H. Watson; Lovell.
Rating: PG-13
Spoilers: None
Notes/Warnings: "Sherlock Holmes" (2009) Universe. Set before the Blackwood case.
Disclaimer: This is for fun, not profit. Enjoy.
Summary: Dinner at Sherringford Hall ( Read more... )

pg-13, fic, holmes/watson

Leave a comment

Comments 20

eatdrink_bemary February 6 2010, 03:54:48 UTC
OH NOOO.

Sherlock, stop being a pissybitch and apologize to Watson!!
I can't wait to read this story. Every time there's an update I go WILD with happiness. Write quickly!!

Reply


descrime February 6 2010, 04:34:39 UTC
I love Holmes and Watson in this story. And the argument at the end, man, Holmes twisting Watson's plea around into an insult was just brutal. Well done.

One thing, Holmes has always easily admitted that Mycroft is the superior deduction expert of the two. He just can't be bothered to follow up to see if those deductions are right.

Reply

gaedhal February 6 2010, 04:47:43 UTC
Holmes is indulging himself here -- and Watson hardly knows
Mycroft, so I'm fudging. Plus, Holmes is being a prat.

Reply


kattahj February 6 2010, 08:57:56 UTC
I giggled at Watson forcing Holmes to eat the vegetables. You're really doing excellent things with their banter.

Reply

gaedhal February 6 2010, 21:47:06 UTC
You know he's a fussy eater!

Reply


kataren February 6 2010, 12:18:38 UTC
This is why Holmes prefers not to socialize, no? Almost everything will sound wrong. I can empathize with him... :P

Reply


akasha_lilian February 6 2010, 12:52:30 UTC
To your prior reply, I have seen the newest movie and liked it, too. Michael Caine and Ben Kimgsley were a really good pair as well though.
Love the banter between the two snd can hardly wait for more to come. I'm glad you're dedicated to this story at the moment!!! =)

The two must needs work together or else it is all in vain!

Is it mOst needs?

Reply

gaedhal February 6 2010, 20:06:27 UTC
No, it's an archaic construction.

Reply

akasha_lilian February 6 2010, 22:46:01 UTC
Huh, thanks for that! Love the icon!!!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up