Alright! Let's do Halloween! This one is particularly rich in the feminist text, so make yourself some tea. :)
Mission Statement:This series is intended to outline the feminist text of each episode so as to provoke and encourage open discussion. It's not so much about making value judgments about events and/or characters but about analyzing the
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
She takes control of the situation in Buffy's house in order to go find Giles who actually saves the day. Her role, like in PG, is to be the ~voice~ and the spirit. She doesn't even get to be the one who figures out who's doing the dirty deeds -- she has all the evidence already in her mind, but it's Giles who pulls out the pieces from her through interrogation.
So it seems like Willow's form of leadership is limited. What if Xander hadn't taken Willow's orders? There's a comment above about how "you would take orders from a woman, are you feeble in some way?" is satirical -- but I feel it's pretty spot-on (if overblown) for how some men act when a woman's put in charge (and I've faced this sort of attitude myself). She might cause a nuclear holocaust with her ladyparts if she's in charge, you guys!In-story, I think it's that Willow isn't used to leading, so she immediately returns to the library and offers up her leadership ( ... )
Reply
Reply
she sees Giles as being more admirable and more relatable as book man than as romance man.I think it also might show Willow not thinking much of performance because she's aware of the gender roles -- ooooh they're both being so cliche. Which is funny considering how she'll go forward. She begins to realize the need to ~perform in order to become (a la Spike), but she's always overly aware of her performance and afraid of being found out for her falsehood ( ... )
Reply
Reply
This no doubt stems from gender expectations, too. Spike's performative show is hypermasculine. He only gives in to ALL MY CREYS when he's in private (after Buffy storms off in FFL, as he's storming off down the street after Cecily rejects him) or when he's too mentally exhausted and lost to perform (the end of Beneath You) and has given up all hope of wearing a costume convincingly.
Willow's self-effacement, I think, falls in line with the expectations that women not be ~smart or bossy. Even Willow's cutesy way of speaking softens her displays of intellect. The first time she snaps at Giles and Angel in Reptile Boy, it's immediately followed by a ramble that displaces the sense of authority she'd just commanded over the two men ( ... )
Reply
Season seven Willow is like a vector sum of all the previous Willows.
Reply
In terms of empowerment, S7 Willow seems like a step backward. She starts off being apprenticed again by Giles and the Devon coven; when she gets back to Sunnydale she slips into maximum self-effacement mode and literally disappears. For the rest of the season, she's a mass of self-doubt and tries to avoid conflict of any kind (e.g. refusing to help Buffy against Anya in "Selfless"), being once again content in a sidekick role. Even the spell in "Chosen" is Buffy's idea, which Willow resists on the grounds of her own supposed weakness.
But I think the writers (and the actor) are saying something more subtle about power. S7 Willow has, finally, begun to understand that power isn't a worthy end in itself. I'm not entirely sure how that fits in with a feminist reading, but I would say Willow has become an adult. Not the "final" or "real" Willow, because what's that, right? (For anyone, not juts her.) But a Willow who understands sacrifice and loss.
Reply
But by the end of "Get It Done," Willow is very honest in explaining "how [she] work[s]" by glomping onto the strongest person in the room and zapping Kennedy of her strength. She's very accepting of what has to be done. Hesitant, but she still "get[s] it done."
Nonetheless, Buffy's faith in Willow and her need for Willow to act are the prompts for Willow's empowerment again. Which strikes me as very feminist, especially in light of the historical context of women's relationships (I've been studying women's clubs and unions during the late 19th century).
Reply
Yep. The scene at the end of STSP where Buffy insists on lending her own strength to Willow encapsulates this pretty well, I think. Buffy's also probably trying to teach Willow something about the nature of power/leadership. It's a beautiful scene.
Reply
Reply
Dark Willow: part of what happens when Willow kills Warren is that she becomes Warren, including the hyper-masculine acting out, in some respects ("I'm just getting wood for the violence here!"). And she's revelling in the performative act, agreed. She also plays up (as Vamp Willow does) her cute little girl schtick so deliberately. One of my favourite moments is when she tosses the fireball in the air to go after Jonathan and Andrew: "Unless somebody, some how, can get there in time to save them! Oh well, fly my pretty, fly! See what I did there?" The gender stuff will be interesting to unpack, the performative masculinity and femininity she goes through.
Dark Willow is when she's reveling in the performance -- look what I can do? -- and she's aware that it's false but that it's also true. She's caught between her ability to create and her need to conform because reality is determined by interaction with and the perception of ~others. If a Willow falls in the woods and no one's there to hear it, does she make a sound? If a ( ... )
Reply
Our analysis of Buffyverse relationships sometimes makes me feel cynical about relationships. Was Tara only Willow's greatest love because Tara helped Willow connect with herself more fully? But is that bad or is that just the reality that's romanticized into something else? Is Tara as much a person to Willow as Spike is to Buffy? (Have you read The Awakening? Because the protagonist, Edna, loves a man who connects her with her true inner self and awakens her sensual nature, helping her to live more fully as herself.)
It doesn't matter what she does when she's alone, because she doesn't even exist aloneShe fears this is true, sometimes she believes it. But I think ultimately her story proves that ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Right, I agree! Just that Willow doesn't seem to realize that what she does alone affects her, and by affecting her, she affects others in how she later interacts with them. She thinks she's in control of herself internally because she's able to do magic now, but it's actually the opposite. And the ripples affect everyone. Oh, TOYL. RIPPLES.
Reply
Leave a comment