Leave a comment

Comments 5

Bah luzclarita February 14 2005, 16:20:19 UTC
If we can't even figure out what causes some diseases then I don't see how a nanorobot would help.

From the sci-fi angle this is interesting, but I think there are a lot of things this guy doesn't take into consideration: cancer, M.S., arthritis (may or may not be genetic, we don't know -- but who wants to live a hundred or more arthritic years?) . . . anyhow that's the pessimist/atheist in me speaking.

Reply

Re: Bah fuckadonutujerk February 15 2005, 04:32:41 UTC
It's ideas like this that make me wish Asimov were still writing. Maybe the nanorobots could reanimate his corpse and then he would be half zombie half robot. Where am I going with this? I don't know.

Reply

Re: Bah luzclarita February 15 2005, 07:03:49 UTC
Ohh . . . that's really good! :) I like the whole retribution for being an egomaniac and letting science run rampant theme (a good theme in sci-fi if I do say so).

Reply


kawaiinose February 14 2005, 17:44:51 UTC
i was sad to hear that his routein is only to keep him healthy, not the key to him immortality...
have you read jitterbug perfume by tom robbins?
after reading that book I was convinced that the secret to immortality was a daily series of hot and cold bathes....

Reply

fuckadonutujerk February 15 2005, 04:30:33 UTC
No I haven't read it.

My secret to immortality is...wait. I barely know you.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up