I'm going to preface this with a disclaimer. For those of you on my f-list who don't know me beyond fic and squee - and I truly try to keep my LJ firmly within those boundaries, as it is my happy place of fictional escapism - I'm pulling out the soapbox. Don't say I didn't warn you
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
(The comment has been removed)
Glad I could help.
Reply
You've managed to say everything I was thinking much more coherently than I could, but OH MY HELL. Radical feminists are ruining it for everyone, I swear to god. The "rape" as defined by this "womyn" ("womyn" is always when my bullshit/wank-dar goes off in gender/race/class privilege discussions) is mindboggling. I mean really, really? You can attack the class issues of prostitution (and the pimp/prostitute relationship, which is obviously oppressive), but THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT RAPE. THE PROSTITUTE HAS CONSENTED TO IT AND PROBABLY HAD A HAND IN THE MONETARY ASPECT OF IT, ESPECIALLY IF IT'S A JOSS SHOW AND IT'S ON A NETWORK THAT' ( ... )
Reply
I hate, hate that she is the feminist archetype in the minds of Americans. She's exactly why "feminist" is a dirty word. There's no logic, no valid argument, just rhetoric. To add insult to injury, she's deleting comments that oppose her point of view. Yes, because that's going to work in the real world.
She honestly reads like a net-glorified feminist. You know the type - the ones who sob all over LJ that they're anorexic or dyslexic or asexual, just for the attention it may bring. I have never read an "argument" that made such little sense on each and every point. She's talking to hear herself speak, and craving the attention the controversy will bring. That's my take, anyway.
Note how I did not claim my opinion as absolute truth. Ugh. Asshat.
I second your last guess, though. For the record.
Reply
Reply
choke the bitch. god/i/christian bale will thank you.
Reply
Yes, I think Courtney DOES have to choke a bitch in this particular instance.
Proceed at once, plz.
Reply
This chick obviously wants a world of nothing but black lesbian sex. I wonder if she has objections to woman-on-woman violence. It's close enough, right?
Reply
http://users.livejournal.com/_allecto_/34718.html?thread=282270#t282270
She links to her views on sex and to boil it down to this (not that i read any of the original crap because really, who gives a fuck about ignorant people):
I believe in the radical feminist definition of rape. That is that men who pressure women into sex are rapists. That women who are pressured are not freely consenting and are therefore being raped. There have been a few discussions recently in the rad fem blogosphere debating whether all male initiated sex is rape, given that women are politically, socially and economically subordinate to men. So, in my understanding of Joss Whedon as a rapist is hinges on my definition of rape. I would argue that most 'sex' between men and women, in the contemporary 'sex-positive', pornographic, male-supremacist culture, is rape.
Reply
There are so many things wrong with that statement that I've lost count. The only way that holds water is on the Fail Boat.
Reply
I think you might mean a male feminist. I mean, surely there are women in power who would naturally be more feminist than Joss Whedon.
I think you do need to choke a bitch, though.
Reply
That is indeed what I meant. Though some days, I'm not so sure. *eyes Shonda Rhimes*
That's two in favor of choking. I'm going to take it to five, and then start Googling.
Reply
Reply
Succinct but sincere ;)
B xxx
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment