An immoral law is no law, and anyone who says otherwise is too servile to deserve the protection of the law. Would you have returned a runaway slave under American "law" before 1865?
You're repeating yourself, and you're not any more convincing the second time around. In fact, by trying to be clever, you just prove that you don't understand what you are talking about. If I buy a hand-made shoe from you and use it for walking, I haven't impinged on your rights. If I buy it, copy it, and then use the copies to compete against you, I'm a fucking scoundrel, a rattlesnake, a creature without honour or worth. And if on top of it I claim the LEGAL (!!) right to prevent you from using your own design, and the exclusive right to use it myself, I am a barbarous creature of night, an undead piece of vermin whose best destiny is to die swiftly with a stake through what it uses for a heart. And if the law favours me, then it is no law, just a vile conspiracy of lawyer criminals, of the kind that protects rich criminals from Naples to Beijing. End of debate. And thanks for giving me the best possible reason to use pirated files.
Oh dear. So I'm emotionally involved. Dear dear me. Well, you know, sheer evil does that to me. But since you seem happy to live with it, I will not insist. Anyone who gets to be an adult without realizing that there is such a thing as right and wrong is not capable of understanding most adult speech.
P.S.: please stop posting repetitions of things you have already repeated three times. They don't get any better, and life is too short to put up with apologies for corporate corruption and intellectual theft.
Comments 5
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment