fpb

Another reason why the current party system is poisoning Britain

Mar 06, 2009 17:41

The one good thing about the British parliamentary system is the stake that every MP is supposed to have in his or her constituency. They are supposed to be ambassadors for the needs and interests of their constituents. However, in order to have a career at all they have also to be subservient followers of the party line, and, where the ( Read more... )

politics, britain, polemics

Leave a comment

Comments 5

annie_from_aust March 6 2009, 22:52:08 UTC
We in Australia also use the Westminster Parlaiment like the UK.

I agree with everything you said. Here there are 2 main parties and one smaller Greens, which can influence the Senate. So my local candidate follows the party line run by people in the Eastern States you couldn't give a toss about my state and certainly my electorate.

We do have about 5 Independents in the Federal Parliament. 2 are from Right ring chrisian organisations. Another one Nick X from my State is Anti Poker machines. He is very good at representing the interests of our State, especially if he has time left from self promotion.

I am sure you are nodding your head at my descriptions.

Reply


stigandnasty919 March 9 2009, 10:31:57 UTC
Once again, could not agree more. I'm going to have to get a medical, that's twice in a row we'ver agreed about something political ;)

Reply


fishlivejournal March 16 2009, 13:15:50 UTC
While it is convenient to blame the party system - and there's no doubt that the party system makes the problem worse - a more serious problem is electorate apathy. I've been to 'meet and greets' where I was the only person present who wasn't a party member; and despite the meet being moderately well advertised. If a politician repeatedly has their efforts to represent their voters rebuffed, then naturally they are going to grow cynical.

Fortunately, this is a problem that the churches can help solve. Each election, invite the candidates to each give a 5 minute presentation to a congregation! It benefits everybody - except for the Christian hating extremists.
Last local election, my electorate went one further and recorded a meet and greet to broadcast it through multiple curches. (Sadly I didn't find out about it until afterwards). This sort of thing could revitalise local politics.

Reply

fpb March 16 2009, 14:56:00 UTC
Electorate apathy is a by-product of the party system. When the political process is monopolyzed by two or three elephants none of which has much to do with the viewpoints of the electors, the electors are quite right to stay home. To do otherwise would be to admit that they have a duty to select a master from a limited and unrepresentative choice, and it would be taken to mean support for someone whom they, at best, regard as the least bad of two or three very bad evils.

Reply

fishlivejournal March 17 2009, 00:49:57 UTC
Your argument will work in situations where other candidates are excluded from running - however when independents can run, this is merely an excuse. The electorate can and has voted independents in. The political monopolies only exist because the electorate permits them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up