A federal judge denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against a history teacher for making disparaging remarks about Christians during class. Interesting arguments here, such as, “…yes, he was making that point [about Joseph II's efforts], but he also included his own point…” because everyone knows, especially in an AP History class that history is
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
"I believe there's a plausible case," Selna said in a Santa Ana courtroom. "… What we face at trial and summary judgment is a different matter."
He is wanting to get to trial so he can issue a summary judgement that can be used by others.
By dismissing the case, there would be no judgement for the record.
Reply
Regardless, it's a silly and stupid case, and a sad commentary that Christians, for example, can say almost anything they want about most any other less popular faith, but when it comes to Christianity itself, the rules are different. I have a real hard time with a majority religion claiming victim status. I guess he should consider himself fortunate. Had he been teaching in say, Saudi Arabia and said such things about Mohammad, they would have just chopped his head off. Christians aren't quite to that point -- yet.
Reply
Say what he said in Europe from 500 to 1700 and you might have been burned.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment