Comments | forward_looking: Sources?

ankh_f_n_khonsu in forward_looking

Sources?

Jul 23, 2007 23:40

For those with an interest in "cold" fusion, can anyone give some links to journal-quality research?

Cold Fusion Times has some decent articles (and some tripe), but their layout makes it difficult to take the site seriously. It looks like it was coded in 1993.

Cheers.

Comments 64

shamebear July 24 2007, 07:19:07 UTC

There's not much journal-quality research at all when it comes to cold fusion, but issue 2602 of New Scientist, from the fifth of May 2007, carried an article that I think summarized the state of the art.

ankh_f_n_khonsu July 24 2007, 07:48:35 UTC

Several countries have massive cold fusion research programs.

Perhaps the literature has yet to trickle to us Anglophones?

Namaste.

hegemonic imperial conspiracy shamebear July 24 2007, 12:12:15 UTC

here you reveal your anglo-imperial mindset by immediately assuming that I belong to the anglo-american hegemony, just because I'm able to write english and discuss science.

Re: hegemonic imperial conspiracy ankh_f_n_khonsu July 24 2007, 16:22:39 UTC

I asked a question. Reading accusations of hegemony into a simple question must attract you plenty of friends.

Namaste.

dirkcjelli July 24 2007, 13:10:03 UTC

See if you can find the final papers by Bose... there isn't anything there.

ankh_f_n_khonsu July 24 2007, 16:31:52 UTC

Yeah, the fission industry would certainly like people to think that.

Namaste.

dirkcjelli July 24 2007, 16:56:32 UTC

A conspiracy theory is not a suitable substitute for an argument.

ankh_f_n_khonsu July 24 2007, 17:06:36 UTC

Do you disagree? You think the fission industry would actually support this research?

Funny how the overwhelming majority of criticism against F&P came from the fission industry, eh? Funny how the US Navy seems to think the research viable, eh?

Be careful of the ivory towers you choose to protect.

Namaste.

Thread 33

Cold fusion was widely replicated anonymous July 25 2007, 15:12:08 UTC

Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times, in over 100 of world-class laboratories including the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at China Lake, Amoco, SRI, Texas A&M, Los Alamos, Mitsubishi Res. Center, BARC Bombay and many more. These replications were published in long-established peer-reviewed journals. There are roughly 500 peer-reviewed papers on this subject, and ~3000 other papers in conference proceedings and other non-peer-reviewed sources ( ... )

Re: Cold fusion was widely replicated ankh_f_n_khonsu July 25 2007, 15:36:53 UTC

Beautiful!

Cheers mate!

Namaste.

Re: Cold fusion was widely replicated dirkcjelli July 25 2007, 22:26:49 UTC

There is not the slightest chance this is a chemical reaction or an experimental error.

These words speak volumes... not the slightest chance?

Re: Cold fusion was widely replicated anonymous July 26 2007, 14:22:07 UTC

Dirk wrote ( ... )

Thread 30