The internet is a weird, wild place. One of the glorious things about it is the ease and immediacy with which we can communicate, share, create, sell, add and delete online content, and more
( Read more... )
Hey, I think you're missing the key link to Francesco Francavilla's callout! This line just repeats the Francesco link in the previous line instead of going to his entry about it (which I can't seem to find): "who called out Teefury.com today for infringing on a work he created in 2006"
Hm. Looking at the two images...they're very similar, but they aren't the same at all. Maybe it would be infringing in the legal sense, but I'm not feeling the moral outrage on this one. It looks more like someone didn't quite like Francesco's version but thought the basic idea was worth doing a variation on. Like, I could imagine wanting to own both of those variants.
It's true they aren't the same, i.e. they do not = each other. But in the legal sense, they do not need to be for infringement to occur; and the similarities here, to my eye as an attorney at least, are strong enough to hold up the argument that there has been infringement.
I have recently opined that arguing copyright law on the internet (especially with laymen, but I'm not sure it's better if two lawyers mix it up) is one of the classic blunders, along with "never get involved in a land war in Asia" and "never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line." And besides, I'm at work, and don't have internet in my apartment yet (Verizon is coming tomorrow to hook everything up--yay FiOS!), so let's just put a pin in this and come back later, eh? *grin*
Comments 11
"who called out Teefury.com today for infringing on a work he created in 2006"
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment