Another garbage movie

Jul 11, 2007 18:53

Last night we went to see a midnight showing of Harry Potter.  While it did manage to keep up with the expected CGI the story left much to be desired.  It used almost every classic movie tactic that we have all seen a million times before.  Having seen only fragments of the first and second movie and none of the third of fourth i expected minor ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

magicfuzzball July 11 2007, 23:30:37 UTC
Now i suppose there is a slim chance that they were clapping because it was over and not that is was good but by the way they were dressed, i doubt it.

i love it.

Reply


tink_loves_bell July 20 2007, 18:10:50 UTC
How could you accuse me of making exaggeratedly long livejournal posts when you've made the giant biopic of watching a movie? Nudge.

Reply


Oh and... tink_loves_bell July 20 2007, 18:13:46 UTC
This was a children's movie based off a children's novel(s) that happened to find success with adults. And, in terms of theatrical tastes, shall I even darest to bring up the undeniable shittiness of The Dead Pool?

Reply

Re: Oh and... followgreatness July 20 2007, 19:54:55 UTC
Hey, you leave Clint out of this. I take no responsibility for the last 4 Dirty Harry movies, but the first one is a classic that no one argue. And teaching kids to enjoy crap movies with paper thin characters and a transparent plot like Harry Potter is on a totally different level than Dead Pool, after all it didnt have a best selling book behind it. It just had Clint getting drunk off stage and shooting guns till someone turned on a camera.

Reply

Re: Oh and... tink_loves_bell July 20 2007, 20:01:31 UTC
Isn't that the way with all Clint Eastwood movies?

Reply

Re: Oh and... followgreatness July 20 2007, 22:25:45 UTC
i'd say no more than 95%. But when you turn a best selling book into a movie (and from what i have heard the book was very good), the movie shouldnt be total crap.
And my love for westerns aside, i can still admit that the majority of them are "bad" movies.

Reply


followgreatness July 20 2007, 19:58:43 UTC
and i didnt complain about the size of your post i just said i didnt read it because it was too long. I assumed you didnt care if i read them or not.

ps splitting your messages up doesnt count as two short posts hehe

Reply

tink_loves_bell July 20 2007, 20:03:03 UTC
I don't care if you read them or not, but you are significantly missing out on the hot, pornographic, girl on girl on guy action that is in there every single day.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up