Wiscon panel: From Sherlock to Sheldon: Asexuality and Asexual Characters in SF/F

May 27, 2012 15:44

From Sherlock to Sheldon: Asexuality and Asexual Characters in SF/F ( Read more... )

wiscon, gender, books, culture, television, relationships

Leave a comment

Comments 27

kate_nepveu May 28 2012, 12:34:14 UTC
Thanks.

I wonder if anyone has done a recs list for _Sherlock_ asexuality stories.

Reply

firecat May 28 2012, 14:11:03 UTC
This might be a good place to start looking
http://asexual-fandom.dreamwidth.org/

And there is a list of Sherlock communities here:
http://studyinsherlock.livejournal.com/profile

Reply


cakmpls May 28 2012, 15:12:13 UTC
Very interesting. Thanks for the write-up!

I'm not at all certain that Sheldon is asexual. He is obviously quite touch-phobic, and he appears oblivious (in at least two episodes) to come-ons from women interested in one-night stands. But neither of those is the same as being asexual, is it? He finds the idea of himself "engaging in coitus" laughable, but if he could do so entirely without touching another human ... ?

Reply

firecat May 28 2012, 17:30:53 UTC
I haven't seen BBT myself but there was some discussion of the nuances of Sheldon's sexuality or lack thereof at the panel that I didn't record.

Reply


oracne May 29 2012, 14:16:00 UTC
Thanks for the writeup! Sounds like a really intriguing panel.

Reply


apostle_of_eris May 29 2012, 20:48:00 UTC
Glad someone mentioned Asimov. His stories are notoriously sexless. I don't recall asexual characters in particular, but his plotting was rigorously asexual.

Reply

firecat May 30 2012, 02:31:08 UTC
Most of it. What wasn't, IMO, was pretty bad.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

bookblather May 31 2012, 19:16:34 UTC
I'm here from asexual_fandom on DW, and I wanted to agree with this comment. I'm an activist in other areas of life as well (mostly against sexism and ableism), but I never quite connected the "patriarchy/sanity privileging hurts men/neurotypical people too" to "asexual erasure hurts sexual people too." This idea that if asexual people get more exposure as the variety of people that we are, people who are sexual and are generally perceived as asexual have more freedom-- I think I need to think about it more, but I like it on first glance.

Reply

firecat June 1 2012, 00:38:55 UTC
Thanks for letting me know it's linked there. I should have linked it there myself, since I watch that community, but I forgot.

I think that the more real diversity/variety is shown, the more people benefit in general.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up