Some Racefail thoughts

Mar 06, 2009 14:45

If a person has multiple identities and names, and if they state that they do not want other people to publicly associate their different identities and names, it is wrong to publicly associate their different identities and names. (There might be exceptions to this if a person has committed criminal activities. But writing things that piss you off ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

ljgeoff March 7 2009, 19:00:43 UTC
Every time I read a post about RaceFail, my heart sinks. I've always had the idea that sf readers were the best that humanity has. Really. That's what I've thought. (Because, hey, that's me, eh?) I think, too, that if I said something stupid, it'd be ... hrm, seen as a small thing said by a small person. But when someone with a readership says something stupid, it's all over the 'net. Makes me feel all cringy.

Reply

firecat March 7 2009, 19:15:09 UTC
I think some SF readers are very good humans.

I also think that good humans make mistakes sometimes.

This made my heart sink: In the January round of RF, some people were saying things like "You're approaching the text from an emotional place, and that's wrong." And some of those people identify as feminists. And that's exactly what men said to women when we first started analyzing texts from a feminist perspective.

Reply

kmd March 7 2009, 19:20:54 UTC

I've always had the idea that sf readers were the best that humanity has.

This is a very, very common idea among white SF fans. And this idea is right at the heart of the causes of RaceFail09.

Reply

jordan179 March 7 2009, 19:55:20 UTC
I've always had the idea that sf readers were the best that humanity has.

This is a very, very common idea among white SF fans. And this idea is right at the heart of the causes of RaceFail09.

How so? And what makes you think that black, Hispanic, and East Asian sf fans don't share this sentiment?

Speaking of which, have you ever seen any anime? Especially the English-subtitled variety, in which moral supremacism for the writer's POV is often quite naked and extreme?

Or do you make Japanese "honorary Aryans?"

Reply

firecat March 7 2009, 20:28:05 UTC
You know what, I have unscreened this post along with your previous one, but I really don't like the tone or the offensive language you are using in these comments. This is notice that I won't be unscreening any other posts of yours that use snarky (such as "polylogist nonsense") or racist (such as "honorary Aryans") language.

Reply

ailbhe March 7 2009, 20:42:51 UTC
Thank you. I was on the being-rude-or-shutting-up fence and I hadn't decided which side to get off yet.

Reply

kmd March 7 2009, 21:26:50 UTC

Heh. Well, ole jordan up there posted a link in his journal to this discussion, and the text of my longer comment (without attribution of course -- tsk, jordan, what would Ayn Rand say?) so now my inbox is peppered with some of the most hilarious Outraged Randian Rants you can imagine.

This never stops being funny to me, given that I spent at least 15 years of my life mired in the Randian stuff, too.

Reply

jordan179 March 7 2009, 23:10:53 UTC
I'm not an Objectivist. You don't have to be an Objectivist to call philosophical evil "Randian," because she is identifie with the concept.

Reply

kmd March 7 2009, 20:30:49 UTC

How so?

See my further comments below.

Reply

kmd March 7 2009, 20:28:40 UTC

I want to say more about this. I came to this understanding because of the writing of some people of color here on livejournal. Primarily, through a post in debunkingwhite by stoneself. This was a while back, when stoneself wrote that the process for white people coming to consciousness about white privilege and racism is very much like the process of the stages of grief.

I was working as a chaplain resident at the time, and this was a huge aha moment for me. HUGE. Because I was familiar with what grief looks like, and therefore the truth of stoneself's observations was immediately obvious to me.

White people coming to consciousness about white privilege means accepting the death of our self-image of white innocence.

This is especially hard for communities like the white SF community, in which white folks seek and create community that feels like such a relief. Nerds -- welcome! Brains -- welcome! And because speculative fiction is so often about utopias and dreaming a better world, SF fandom can feel like this wonderland where nerds come together to dream a better ( ... )

Reply

firecat March 7 2009, 22:20:05 UTC
Lots of insights here that ring true for me. Thanks very much for sharing them.

Reply

ljgeoff March 8 2009, 03:40:48 UTC
White people coming to consciousness about white privilege means accepting the death of our self-image of white innocence.

Yes. I really get this, and I agree. And it's taken me a really long time to even want to look at this stuff, in the same way that I didn't want to look at feminist issues. My whiny two-year-old self was kicking it's feet and saying "this is where I play -- I don't want to have to grow up and look at it like an adult"

Thanks again for the post, firecat and the insightful reply, kmd

Reply

trinker March 9 2009, 13:27:06 UTC
I said earlier in another journal - "I'm a PoC and I like escapism when it lets me escape. It *really* sucks when the escape vehicle turns out to aim me RIGHT BACK at the stuff I was trying to escape from."

Reply

firecat March 9 2009, 18:48:05 UTC
HA. Well said.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up