Some of us remember
Clause 28 - a repressive, bigoted bit of legislation that had only one design: to denigrate gay people. Gay people at the time weren't doing anything much to bother society, except dying in their droves of a terrifying new disease - but apparently, for the promoters of this barbarous piece of legislation, even dying a death of
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
( ... )
Reply
Reply
I know it's a bit of a strident post, and some local authorities tried to mitigate the impact of Clause 28 (and the raft of legislation surrounding it) - but sometimes I think being a bit strident is called for :0)
And that's the bit about it that really gets to me - Clause 28 was the government sanctioned de-humanisation of a set of people simply for being who they were. And that's what made it so dangerous.
A lot of rubbish gets talked about things being like Nazi Germany - but this really was - and I never think we should let the overuse of the analogy diminish how scary that is.
Reply
We had parents complain. We had teachers complain. I think, looking back, that the biggest raft of complaints was when I tried to introduce poetry written by Caribbean or Indian authors.
Rants are good. Though so often you're ranting to the converted. I have just about given up ranting on a regular basis, though I would stand my ground if anyone said something out of line in my presence. I was paid to rant, but it was also something I cared passionately about.
And yes, there are Nazi-style thought seething under the surface of the British character and we should not forget.
Reply
I was taught English by someone from an ethnic minority - apparently you can be both non-white and literate - who knew ? 😍
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment