Leave a comment

Comments 4

zadok_allen September 20 2010, 09:35:59 UTC
I thought Paxton and Henriksen totally upstaged the protagonists in that film, in a good way. Another one of your "found families" eh?

There's a great anecdote about Henriksen on that movie listed under Fun Stuff on the IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093605/

Reply

zombres September 20 2010, 17:12:20 UTC
Oh ABSOLUTELY. Granted, I think Henriksen upstages EVERYONE in ANY movie he's ever in. He's just so goddamned intense and amazing. And that anecdote? Is one of the reasons why I love him so much. The man is a hardcore BAMF, and no mistake about that. LOL.

Reply


lita64 September 20 2010, 20:43:57 UTC
Awesome reviews! :D

I'm all for vampires that don't sparkle in the sunlight, so I think I'm going to have to add Near Dark to my queue.

I will say I'm a bit surprised this only got a G rating...

I find it odd how weird the rating system was back in the day. I mean, Jaws only ever received a PG rating, and it was much bloodier than that rating should have allowed for. Strange indeed.

Reply


chrryblssmninja September 21 2010, 08:08:27 UTC
There are some awkward moments in terms of pacing and dialogue, but I actually think this helps the overall feel of the film, which at times assumes a very surreal dream(or nightmare)-like quality. The gore and special effects are really fabulous, especially given the budget and how old the film is -- Severen especially looks the worse for the wear by the end of the film, and yet never loses his air of jovial menace. And that infamous bar scene? KILLER, in every form of the word.

I agree

I also liked the awesome shootout

it isn't perfect, but doing a modern cowboy vampires thing with suggestions of noir (lighting and such) is great

Reply


Leave a comment

Up