This one's going to be complicated and sum up a long history, so please anyone let me know if this ends up an exercise in difficult to follow linkitude.
Some time ago, the anti-pornography documentary
The Price of Pleasure was released. Various bloggers had much to say about the sloppy research and propagandistic presentation of this documentary. I
(
Read more... )
Comments 9
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
These folk do not like opposition, even when it comes from a relative nobody like me. Getting it from the people they are EXPLOITING in their movie? No question it scares the shit out of them.
If they cannot defend their sloppy slanted work from just little old me? How can they defend it when confronted with the very people who are in their stupid docudrama?
Reply
I'd say I'd help him with that, but it would require being in the same room with him...
If they cannot defend their sloppy slanted work from just little old me? How can they defend it when confronted with the very people who are in their stupid docudrama?
Yeah, that's the thing. SO MANY PEOPLE give this kind of thing a completely free pass. It makes me ill. I remember when I watched an anti-porn slideshow (really hastily put together and its makers admitted it was shoddy.) I was the only one in the room challenging it, and people thought I was kind of disgusting for not being totally revolted.
(Well, I was revolted at what they showed, but it was VERY OBVIOUSLY ridiculously cherry-picked, which I tried to point out. I mean, some of it depicted fetishes I hadn't even thought of, and I'm pretty kinked.)
Reply
Jensen looked like a landed fish. I honestly think he did not have ANY IDEA what he was up against or that oh, gee, maybe I had done my homework.
Reply
Keeping out porn people and their (uneditted) voices is probably exactly the kind of nobel repression Isme was talking about. They need to lie to counter The Patriarchy's lies.
No. Really!
(Okay. This getting into the mind of the anti-porners is giving me a migraine.)
Reply
Leave a comment