Because the
other post has veritably exploded over this issue, I'm making a new post to (1) clarify the specifics of this rule change, (2) elaborate on a new proposal that was raised in the other post, and (3) specify certain TYPES of challenge restrictions and have people vote on those.
(
1 Clarification )
Comments 22
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
By the way, uncalled for question is uncalled for, will you be filling out the Chocobo Meme when you have an opportunity?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I have a similar fear that a lot of those options are going to limit participation (I know for a few of them at least I probably wouldn't be able to participate either), and I'm not really liking that it's become this big of a powder-keg issue either...but I think all member concerns should be addressed since everyone has valid opinions on what they'd like to see in the comm--and this will definitely do that. Hopefully it will help the comm in the long run. ♥
Reply
Well, I'd probably write a few just because if I'm a Monk moderator, I should lead by example if I'm going to ask my teammates to also participate by submitting work. Genuine hypocrisy is not a good colour on me, I'm afraid.
It's just... the urge to participate kinda dwindled when faced with a lot of those options. If we're trying to encourage participation in these challenges (since writing tends to be on the low side unless it's limericks or very short stuff) and we're trying to get new members involved next game, how is this slew of 'if you do X, you can't do Y' look to them? /exaggeration. At the beginning, if the rules were like some of the above, I probably would not have participated for fear of doing it wrong ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment