All last week, I watched the news unfold about the Cassie Edwards plagiarism scandal. For those of you who haven't heard of it, you can get the details by going
HERE and
HERE. For a hilarious, irreverent timeline with opera-themed explanation, go
HERE.
Long story short, Mrs. Edwards is an author who was first accused of copying passages from
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
An author who I really enjoy and who I feel tells good story is more likely to get a pass than someone I'm not familiar with.
Similarly, if the copying is of a relatively limited nature, I'm more likely to get over the initial anger (since I'm an oft-rejected wannabe, but at least use my own words) and check out future books.
I think, to close on a third point, I'd also want to hear a "why"...I may not buy it, but a genuine mea culpa carries a lot of weight in most cases.
Reply
Reply
But then I read the examples you gave, and two other books came to mind, one a massively popular and influential work of fiction (The Clan of the Cave Bear and one a book I simply love, by a world-famous author (The Inheritors by William Golding ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
I think it depends on the extent of the plagiarism. Copying (or paraphrasing, like some of the examples) a dozen sentences or paragraphs in a 400 page book will mean that the vast majority of the story (the characters & plot & 99.9% of the prose) is hers. If I enjoyed the author's work I'd give them another shot, assuming that they had any more published.
Much more than that and I probably wouldn't give them another chance.
Reply
2. Yes, if it were recommended to me by someone whose judgment I trusted, assuring me that the former plagiarist's new work really was terrific -- and original. I'd check it out from the library first, though.
Also, that opera-themed summary is the most hilarious thing I've seen in weeks. Thanks for linking to it.
Reply
For example, I never bought a Janet Dailey book again.
http://hotflashes51.wordpress.com/
Reply
Leave a comment