I am an admin at the
Supernatural Wiki, which is a wiki site for the TV show Supernatural that covers both the show and the fandom.
For each fan convention we have an entry where fans link to their reports, pictures and videos taken during the Conventions. Many conventions have prohibitions on videotaping, but it happens anyway and is usually
(
Read more... )
Comments 30
And then some bright spark breaks those rules and puts it up on the internet anyway. If I were in those videos, I'd be livid. My expectation of privacy has been breached.
Reply
The convention, on the other hand, will be releasing a video of the convention weekend which will include footage of the fans, and at no piont did they ask for permission to film those fans.
Reply
Reply
11. By attending a Hub event, you waive any personal or property rights for your likeness appearing in either still photographs or DVD recordings used by DCA Enterprises for either promotional purposes, or event DVD release.
from http://www.thehubproductions.com/terms-and-conditions
To add, there is a section there about videoing which states that anyone caught filming may be removed from the event, but there is nothing that states that anything will be done after the event if it is found that someone had done it while there.
Reply
Reply
So the question of the links is now moot. But i am still interested whether linking to material equates with posting the material.
Reply
Linking doesn't always equate to publishing, but it can. If you have control over the links and you're presenting them in a context, it is more likely to be found that way, but just a list of links that you aggregate but don't post might not. It hasn't really been looked at here in a copyright setting, and I imagine the bar would be different than for defamation.
Reply
Reply
Though I'm a bit surprised that the organisers are now actually policing the internet for convention content! I think that's a bit beyond the call of duty for them! And I'm not quite sure contacting you was the best way of going about it since like someone else mentioned, you aren't hosting the content. They should've contacted the people who uploaded the clips or the server hosting it, ie. YouTube.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The bad side to taking down the links is two-fold:
1. It's censorship based on a threat of extremely dubious legal action. I don't like the law being abused in this way. I don't think they have any claim against you at all. They might have a contract claim against the original posters, but they'd have difficulty proving damages. They could have a copyright-like claim against the original posters if Australia has something akin to the Anti-bootlegging statute that doesn't only specify musical performances (any Aussie lawyers out there know the answer?), and you didn't post, you only linked. I don't know why people brought up defamation, as there's no claim of falsity. I also assume that you and your server are in the US, so they'd have a hell of a time with jurisdiction. Of course, the reason this kind of bullying works is because most people, and most fans ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
After all, if you go to a con, you expect to be photographed and video taped. And those things go on YouTube because people want to share their experiences with fans who couldn't go.
And. The actors on the panel know that by going to a con, they're gonna be asked for photographs, interviews, autographs. It's part and parcel of promoting their show. I think someone was just trying to make some extra dough, hence why they wanted those links down. They can't sell their video when you've got fan vids up for free, right?
Reply
Leave a comment