ewx

“...and it annoys the pig”

Sep 11, 2008 13:14


So Barack Obama may or may not have allusively compared her to a ( Read more... )

comment, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 22

keirf September 11 2008, 12:26:08 UTC
When book reviewers write something like "Stephen Donaldson is comparable to Tolkein at his best" do you think they mean "Stephen Donaldson at his best is comparable to Tolkien" or not?

Reply

simont September 11 2008, 12:54:49 UTC
And even then, "comparable to" leaves a lot of wiggle-room to say that the comparison in question would have been "isn't anything like as good as".

Reply

ewx September 11 2008, 12:56:46 UTC
Surely it's perfectly clear that that's not what "comparable" means in that context.

Reply

simont September 11 2008, 16:08:12 UTC
Only in cases where it's perfectly clear that the person saying it isn't a smartarse.

Reply


k425 September 11 2008, 12:27:00 UTC
stephdairy September 11 2008, 13:04:25 UTC
And http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR8IhMMhe8w has McCain saying the same thing...

(S)

Reply


beckyc September 11 2008, 12:30:17 UTC
Depends on the context, really. In terms of fighting skills or spoiling for a fight*, the more dangerous animal is probably the more flattering, even if there might be "fighting dirty" implications.

*Arguably, they are fighting, even if it isn't fisticuffs.

Reply

cartesiandaemon September 11 2008, 13:12:58 UTC
Yes, I think in context, the associations for "pit-bull" would be more "tenacious" than vicious?

Reply


burkesworks September 11 2008, 12:33:14 UTC
Pit bulls don't write unreadable hobbity nonsense.

Reply


baljemmett September 11 2008, 12:53:32 UTC
See, problem with being a pig is that you're probably going to get et at some point. At least a pit bull gets to do some savagin' before being introduced to Happy Mr. Shotgun; after the morning I've had, I'm in the mood to savage something!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up