[CFUW 55 -- Li.]

Jul 13, 2007 23:38

I wanted to thank you for trying to help me earlier!

Leave a comment

darkasthe July 14 2007, 08:44:25 UTC
Ah, it's not a problem ...

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 04:16:33 UTC
Useless and dangerous, from a sheep's perspective, since they look like they're marking a safe sheep. I'll keep reading but -- it doesn't seem like Ikki finds it so suspicious that you haven't shared it yet.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 04:17:48 UTC
He's too trusting. But we'll see what he says in response to all of that.

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 04:19:32 UTC
Even if he's trusting, he's being very friendly and vocal with everyone else. It won't hurt to have him support your choice.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 04:23:07 UTC
He's told me to hide it for now. ... I do have a reputation for hiding clues.

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 04:26:24 UTC
Then we're set! The fourth person isn't sharing, either.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 04:28:33 UTC
I wonder if there's any way we could come up with an interpretation of that clue that would help us out.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 04:37:48 UTC
Forget the e-mail. What's written in the post has the same bold font as the last clue we got yesterday ... I think that's our clue for today. It's probably supposed to single Ikki out as another safe, but-- do you think there's any way we could make them interpret it as a three-person clue with Hidan, Ikki, and Dietrich?

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 17:17:06 UTC
I tried mentioning it offhand to Tomo -- trying to get her to think about "threes" -- but she didn't take off with it...

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 17:26:39 UTC
I've planted the idea in Ikki's head. The Doctor may or may not mention something about the story later today, so we'll see where that goes. I think it's best to get them to focus on Dietrich and Hidan for now and get those two up for the ousting.

The shepherd also mentioned to me in private something about someone having to withdraw, so we'll see how that turns out. The game may finally balance out in our favor.

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 17:33:11 UTC
Did the doctor do as you asked last time? Emphasizing the asterisks?

The game already is in our favor -- it's the idea of a shift to a clue that's all wolves or some other trick that bothers me. What did he mean by "withdraw"?

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 17:35:17 UTC
I told him not to later. There was no point once Mikoto started making himself obvious.

I have no idea what's going on with the game anymore, but the Doctor and Mikoto will get caught. It's only a matter of when. He didn't specify; I was taking a nap when he sent the message.

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 17:42:22 UTC
If it's inevitable, perhaps we ought to go along with it. The Shepherd announced that the last person ousted was a wolf -- even if that was a one-time help for the sheep, if a wolf is ousted this round, and if the shepherd says nothing or says a wolf was ousted, the sheep will think that they've caught a wolf.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 17:50:16 UTC
The shepherd announced that Il Palazzo was a sheep. The only problem is that, at the moment, there's no way I can directly gun for either with the people that I'm speaking with. I've already played my cards last round with Mikoto and there's nothing in any of the "clues" to single him out. It's the same with the Doctor.

... I'd like to focus on Dietrich and Hidan this round, as I said. We can regroup next round and plan from there, depending on what we're given. Possibly give the sheep a wolf.

Reply

darkasthe July 15 2007, 17:54:10 UTC
... unless you want to go along with Shinku-san's idea.

Reply

euphiemisms July 15 2007, 17:56:21 UTC
No, I understand what you're saying. But if the entire flock condemns them, and the shepherd announces that the flock has a wolf, it's especially dangerous to take a stand against a vast majority of the flock for a wolf's sake.

Her argument simply dosen't sound convincing.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up