If one reads a commentator
such as Prof. Stephen Walt, the controversy over the mosque near Ground Zero is a very simple matter. Opponents of the mosque proposal are preaching demagogic anti-Muslim intolerance and are therefore simply wrong. Or, as he says:
You know that someone is engaged in demagoguery when they keep using demonstrably false but
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
I keep reading back and forth and I've yet to find any reason not to allow the builders their Constitutional rights. But then, I'm kind of anti-religious so I can't really buy into the 'Burlington Coat Factory is sacred ground because a plane grazed it' arguments. It offends people, it makes them afraid, six months after it's been built, we'll likely never hear about it again.
Reply
Your argument is that a threat by definition can't be real unless the US government is currently taking action against it?
Well, let's see, by that logic, the people in the hijacked airliners should have simply disbelieved in the threat from Al Qaeda on 9-11. I'm sure that if they'd explained your theory to reality, the hijackers would have just vanished in a puff of logic, saving the day. That would have saved a lot of lives!
Reply
So you and the Fox News Commentariat have decided that this community center is being funded by terrorist organisations.
Strangely enough, it's illegal to receive funding from terrorist organisations.
I'm sure you can arrange proof enough to have the project shut down. I mean, surely you have evidence beyond Glen Beck's blackboard.
Right?
Reply
I got the joke about terrorist funding in relation to Fox. Cheers to John Stewart's researchers for that one.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Sacred ground means nothing to an extremist, but as a means to put additional hurt on their targets and victims.
(edited to add: I used to think they'd at least respect that it's, well, a MOSQUE, and not blow it up or something... but it's fast showing that they don't hold anything sacred. Not even their own religious symbols.)
Reply
Reply
I thought it was an existing building, currently in use as some sort of community centre that they were hoping to convert. Did I get that wrong?
Also, I thought there was another mosque actually closer to the ground zero site already.
Reply
(for one thing, pretty much everything within a block or two of the site was wrecked when the towers fell down).
Reply
=)
Reply
Reply
When idiots fight one another over something stupid, we all win.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment