Let us suppose you are a newcomer group a minority of whose members are associated with spectacularly hostile actions, both locally (
rapes, thefts and bashings) and overseas (Bali, 9/11, London, Madrid …). What is the thing you could do to most piss off ocker sentiment? The biggest iconic insult you could manage?
Hmmm, let me think.
I know,
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
Just a thought.
Reply
these sort of posts continually appear to be prevaricated on the same sort of assumptions and leaps to conclusion the left is accused of.
Reply
Reply
And saying a particular group has a crippled epistemology is hardly claiming all epistemology is dead.
Reply
Reply
I make a prediction -- nothing like this is likely to happen in Melbourne. Why not? Because, unlike the Carr-Iemma government, the Bracks government has not screwed up policing.
Sutherland Shire may indeed have a particular problem of intolerance. Local areas can develop nasty dynamics. (Gippsland has some "interesting" issues, for example.) But lots of factors are feeding into this, not merely white racism (which does, of course, exist).
And talking as if the problem is only, or even predominantly, white racism is to miss the actual dynamics and therefore fail to deal effectively with them.
Reply
The point being is that you can't generalise from the Shire to all of Australia - the Shire is the most monocultural locality in the country.
Nothing like this will happen in Melbourne not because our police are particularly more effective (hello, gangland warfare?) than Sydney's but because we've dealt with multicultural issues much, much better.
http://www.theage.com.au/text/articles/2005/12/13/1134236064283.html
Reply
And these things are interactive. The pressure level in Sydney is higher because there is a worse crime problem. It is easier to get multicultural integration "right" in Melbourne than in Sydney because the general social stress levels are lower.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment