Suck on this, Ayn Rand.

Jun 14, 2005 08:37

Yet another reason I don't follow objectivists in idolizing businessmen. SHANGHAI, China (AP) -- Chinese bloggers, even on foreign-sponsored sites, had better choose their words carefully -- the censors are watching.
Users of the MSN Spaces section of Microsoft Corp.'s new China-based Web portal get a scolding message each time they input words ( Read more... )

tyranny

Leave a comment

Comments 13

boffo June 14 2005, 15:43:58 UTC
Ayn Rand didn't idolize *all* businessmen. She specifically had contempt for the businessmen that sell out or collude with the government to avoid participating in actual capitalism. Witness James Taggart, one of the villains in Atlas Shrugged.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

geah June 14 2005, 16:16:49 UTC
Right. If every company refuses to go into China, nothing changes...actually, it probably gets worse.

Just like Levi's and rock 'n' roll helped bring down the Berlin Wall, so will Long live d3mocr4cy, let fr33d0m r1ng.

Reply

ernunnos June 14 2005, 19:18:42 UTC
Helping repressive regimes build the machinery of oppression in no way advances freedom. Blue jeans and music aren't even remotely part of the machinery of oppression. Nice try though.

Reply

geah June 14 2005, 22:17:17 UTC
The Internet and IMing are not the tools of oppression. They're the tools of freedom.

I'd rather see the access there with China's crude, and easily bypassed, attempts at censorship, than no accesss at all.

Reply


yoak June 14 2005, 16:32:44 UTC
You don't follow Objectivists because they idolize Communists and those who oppose democracy, freedom and human rights. Check.

Reply

ernunnos June 14 2005, 19:17:04 UTC
Exactly. That's the practical effect when you assume that the pursuit of profit is the highest good. Not everything that's economically efficient is necessarily compatible with freedom.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

ernunnos June 15 2005, 03:27:02 UTC
Rand's message in her fiction, and her message in her philosophy were often very much at odds.

For example, although many of her characters were independent rogues who broke the law - pirates, terrorists - she supported a strong central government that ruthlessly put down all challenges to its authority on the grounds that anything less was gang rule. Her 'intellectual heir' Leonard Peikoff has even gone so far as to oppose the individual right to keep and bear arms, even though Ayn Rand's own characters are portrayed using personal arms to fight a corrupt government.

People who go by Rand's stories end up with very different ideas than people who go by what she preached in her personal church. When I refer to objectivists (especially big-O Objectivists), I'm usually talking about the latter.

Reply


betternewthings June 14 2005, 18:40:40 UTC
On the upside, every time Western businessmen have thought they could outwit Chinese people, they lost.

Reply

pjammer June 14 2005, 22:10:44 UTC
I think those who sold opium would disagree. :)

Reply

betternewthings June 15 2005, 05:24:10 UTC
well they're getting their payback now.

next: payback for affirmative action!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up