invalidsync's post below got me thinking about this whole issue of 'Natural Horsemanship' vs 'regular' horsemanship. I don't want to argue about it but my own opinion on the matter is it isn't about 'control'. It's about communication and, quite honestly, like people, every horse is different. I use a combination of both 'natural' and 'regular'. In
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
The thing is, that all puts people off and it makes me a bit sad because there are some amazing trainers around and I see a lot of riders who could be getting so much more out of their relationship with their horse, be safer on horseback and probably have more fun as well but they just don't know what is out there and they don't want to ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Onto mounted work I felt the NH ideas work absolutely worthless for my situation if not detremental. I didn't see how slouching around with my hands bracing against my green horse's withers as he trotted around willy nilly was going to improve him in the slightest and I abandoned further study.
Am I a NH person? No. But having taken some valuable ideas from them I can't say they're entirely worthless. Perhaps another horse and rider combo would've benifited from the mounted work and found the groundwork useless. I don't think it's fair to point at something and label it in black and white, good or bad. Study your options, take home whats good for you.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment