Aug 12, 2007 14:34
What did you think of Lovers' Vows? How did reading it change your experience of the novel? And anything else you'd like to say about it, really.
(Don't forget that posting access is currently open to all members, please do put up discussions yourselves! I might extend the week off from the novel-posting to ten days, I have a friend staying till
discussion,
mansfieldpark,
loversvows
Leave a comment
Comments 6
I have to say, it's interesting to see how values have changed since the publication of Mansfield Park. Th play was considered suggestive and shocking back then, but a modern reader just takes it in stride. Children born out of wedlock and casual flings don't make anybody blink any more.
Reply
It didn't seem at all appropriate and boy oh boy is the idea of Mary Crawford and Edmund reading those lines kind of crazy. Rushworth as Count Cassel, who is simply dismissed by everybody, seemed to be the most blatant comparison. I can know see why it is in so many ways the big moment of the novel. Before it, there was a lot of puttering around, people strolling and talking and horses being ridden, but it's still very passive with Fanny as the viewpoint. The play does actually serve to shake things up, just like all the young people intend. And having read it, I can see Fanny's insistence against it more vibrantly, and Edmund's waffling as so much more of a betrayal to their common mores.
Reply
Also the Count looks like not a bad guy at all, at least with a good sense and not a wet blanket, it is not for nothing that Baron does not like him: he's out of his profile. And Amelia laughs over his citing Greek gods - they're just a pack of country pumpkins, that's what they are!
Reply
Reply
As for better understanding of MP it is still to see, because I have not started it yet. But nevertheless joined the community because I'm very interested in JA though textually am only acquainted with "Pride and Prejudice".
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment