So,
angearia, who has once again been a VERY BAD GIRL over at Whedonesque, linked to
this thread about the Dark Horse "announcement" that they are maybe acquiring the rights to the Angel series or something. As usual, there is wild speculation about it, all of which is pretty ridiculous, given that we have zero details about what it means or even what
(
Read more... )
Comments 46
Yeah. Pretty much. It would take more time and space than Season 8 can allow/afford to explain all of that. On the other hand Angel is incomprehensible without it. Catch-22. Plus there's the part where revealing all of that would also reveal how very little Buffy knows of Angel any more which would be a downer given their great 'epic' universe-fated 'wuv' that's worth the destruction of lives and worlds. [insert non-existent eyerolling icon here]
Reply
Yeah, I think that's also part of it - the Bangel relationship doesn't really fit the story Joss wanted to tell, so they just ignored that bit. Much like Willow being insecure about using magic and afraid of going dark again didn't fit the story they wanted to tell in Angel S4, so we end up with Willow the super-witch instead.
Reply
Reply
But how hard would it have been to write Angel as pretty depressed, and when Buffy asks what's wrong, he just says he doesn't want to talk about it? He can still get jealous of Spike, but be less flirty about it, you know? NOT THAT HARD.
Reply
Perhaps licensing concerns would have prevented that, but I find it hard to imagine that if Joss had let the IDW people in on it from the beginning, they wouldn't have wanted to play ball in order to get the Joss stamp of approval.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The Connor thing is especially important. Like, okay, ignore the fact that Angel has all these other friends and earthly attachments. That's super lame, and bad characterization, obviously, but I could almost live with it. But he has a fucking son. You just...can't ignore that. Parenthood means a big shift in priorities for most people, and Angel is definitely one of them. Does he mention that he has a child at ALL in the comics? Even if not by name? If not...yeah. If it is impossible to work the plot you want with the characters you have, you need to either come up with new characters, or a new plot ( ... )
Reply
Nope, not at all. Of course, any mention of it would require, at the very least, an explanation of how a vampire could have a baby in the first place (and presumably with whom, and I'm sure THAT would go over well, lol). And I can definitely see how that would stop the narrative in its tracks, since everyone (except Willow and Faith) would be like, "WHAT?"
He just gave up his son. There is no way that he cares as much about is potential future with Buffy as he seemed to, at least not at that moment. I can't believe he'd have the mental energy. I can try to fanwank it as an emotional defensive mechanism, but that doesn't sit well with me at all, given that Angel is normally broody mcbroody face.
Word.
Yes, these shows were in the same verseHonestly, at this point, I hesitate to say even that much. They started in the same verse, sure, but how can you possibly explain the sun being blacked out in Los Angeles and no one in Sunnydale noticing? How can ( ... )
Reply
Lol, all of your points are completely fair. I really just kind of close my eyes and handwave all of that stuff because, of course, you're right (and I was really bothered by the Jasmine plot-line for that reason). But at the same time, they can't really NOT be the same verse, since there is crossover, and ugh. Maybe Angel!LA is actually a slightly different dimension, and all the highways in are portals that anyone can travel through, and nobody notices?
I have to admit, it cracks me up that you used this as your example, because when I started watching Torchwood, one of my first complaints was that Jack was completely different from when he was on Doctor Who.
At least they have an in-universe explanation for that, though -- his being burned by the Doctor, and then the hundred or so years he lived before Torchwood started. Definitely an adjustment, but as a viewer I feel like, I at least have a sense of WHY he acts so differently. Whereas with the Buffy/Angel ( ... )
Reply
When we watch Angel, we're watching a different version of events, in which the Buffy characters exist, but again, not quite as we saw them on Buffy.
Definitely an adjustment, but as a viewer I feel like, I at least have a sense of WHY he acts so differently.
True. I think my reaction had more to do with the fact that I didn't like New Jack, and missed the one I loved on Who, but it didn't help that it took quite a while to figure out why he's so different.
Reply
And I'm so with you on the whole WTFery of Willow in Angel S4. I mean, what? WHAT?!
I just still cannot for the life of me understand HOW this writers, being parents themselves, can completely negate Angel's development in regards to Connor. That he would willingly want the world and his own son destroyed. And for what?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Angel in an apocalyptic scene. Leading an army of demons with dead bodies all around.
His future. His worst nightmare.
He goes looking for an alternative and he finds Twilight. Or it finds him. And he WANTS to believe he's doing the right thing because he doesn't want his vision to happen.
Reply
As it stands, we have to assume that nobody knows anything, and it's just stupid.
Reply
Yeah, really. And as was mentioned above, the fact that they didn't do this only serves to emphasize how detached Buffy and Angel are now, how little they understand each other, which makes the Twuffy coupling so much more bizarre.
Reply
Leave a comment