Verdict
The court has reached a verdict of guilty.
Polozov: Three hours.
Ekaterina: Where is Violetta (lawer).
Polozov: Violetta? Violetta is fighting somewhere.
Nadezhda: Shame promoters.
Mariya: And producers.
Mariya: The death of the producers - the freedom to prisoners!
Nadezhda: Yeah.
Polozov: Which radical slogans.
Nadezhda: We will write a petition.
Mariya: Yes, we have decided that we will write a petition.
Polozov: For who?
Nadezhda: We all decided we have a collective decision. that we do not have producers and there promoters and all the people who call themselves as impostors.
Polozov: Fine.
Ekaterina: And that already appear on the network do not understand ...
Polozov: Has appeared on the network. There is a service where you can order a variety of concerts and events and the group Pussy Riot - 1 million rubles ($ 30,000).
Feigin: Fine.
woman guard: Hands remove.
Feigin: Hands remove, of course.
woman guard: Of course.
Polozov: 1 000 000 rubles one speech.
Mariya: Listen, we know who sanctioned this (handcuffs), why?
Feigin: Yes specifically bullied.
Polozov: All it's bullshit, on the sentence without handcuffs.
Feigin: Of course it's bullshit.
Polozov: But you are dangerous, the most dangerous criminals in Russia. You won even dog guards.
Ekaterina: Two dogs.
Polozov: Even the two dogs? Today, strengthening, and where the other one?
Mariya: One the most evil and the other good shepherd.
Polozov: A good police dog. Good and evil.
Mariya: Good and evil, yeah.
Polozov: Practical psychological weapon.
Mariya: Did you watch pictures of the cat? Rewrote the hut at the cat.
Polozov: yes, yes.
Mariya: it's funny?
Polozov: Yes, it's funny.
Mariya: Me too liked.
Feigin: Here are some of the people run.
Polozov: Today, there is another deputy, this time the Bundestag.
Mariya: Yes, I can see that there are foreigners.
Polozov: A Kerry McCartney who was present at the trial, already wrote Screwtape people raises London uprising.
Nadezhda: In London, the riots, because Pussy Riot :)
Feigin: Promotions are already in 35 cities.
Polozov: Already in the 60. Today Free Pussy Riot - Global Day.
Volkova: Today, the novaya gazeta came out great interview.
Ekaterina: Not let me a paper (documents) to raise here on top.
Polozov: We were allowed to pick up the documents here, they can pick up after the verdict.
Officer: Ok.
Volkova: Still not allowed visitors.
Polozov: It is not a question of the convoy.
Feigin: Who is it, Navalny?
Volkova: Navalny, guys have to go there, I'm tired of fighting. Udaltsov unbolted now do nothing. Interviews conducted.
Feigin: When the screw ?
Polozov: Always nothing. Let's go see what's there.
Feigin: Go on, I'm here to guard.
Feigin: You read a farewell call Maura?
Nadezhda: We are fools, you have not noticed.
Ekaterina: We do not read, do not know.
Feigin: Someone else has something I wrote ...
Mariya: Zizek wrote that we know. Why did not you bring.
Ekaterina: It is interesting to read what Zizek writes.
Nadezhda: Yes, very.
Ekaterina: You would lean against so ...
Nadezhda: Or in jail.
Feigin: I'll get in jail.
Woman guard: folder carry away.
Feigin: I can hide behind your dog here.
Feigin: Basically, what I'm saying. Today they just announced, tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday ... on Monday. When it will be announced, and we discuss it. Well, in general you will be condemned.
Nadezhda: Well, that's understandable.
Mariya: Thank you.
Ekaterina: Thank you.
***
The Court cannot agree with a lack of hate motive. The defendants position themselves as supporters of feminism, that is, the movement for equal rights for men and women. But the state guarantees equal rights! Belonging to feminism is not a crime, but is incompatible with Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Islam. Although feminism is not a religion, it intrudes into areas that are significant to religion ... In the emotions and gestures of the defendants we can see hatred ... The defense mentions that the Constitution is valid throughout the Russian Federation, and because they are not attracted for the same actions by trolley or in the subway, they can't be condemned for that. The "speech" - in quotes - of the group "Pussy Riot" is not associated with a specific object ... but when moving to an Orthodox church the object changes, as it has moved into the sphere of protection of people in different areas. And in the disruption of normal routine CCS - there is only one element of disrespect to the faithful ...
The Court finds that these actions offend, inciting hatred and enmity, which contradicts the Constitution. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alekhina were obviously aware of the negative reaction to their campaign, having deliberately prepared masks with slits for eyes and mouth, and dresses. That is, this was a premeditated crime. The court considers the testimony of the defendants that they did not have a motive of hatred with distrust, as a tactic of the defense chosen to mitigate the punishment. There are no reasons not to trust the victims and witnesses. From the victims' testimony, we have learned that all the actions of the defendants and unidentified participants clearly expressed religious hatred and enmity. The victims were deeply humiliated, they suffered non-pecuniary damage. Their actions were organized for this.
The testimony of the witnesses and victims are consistent. It was observed that, in favor of the prior agreement, the night before February 21st there was a rehearsal in the Elokhovskiy Church, as well as in the back room. Tolokonnikova's discussion in preparing the action was also documented. They had agreed to conduct videotaping of the provocative actions... they withdrew the gown... (Masha's mother: "Why are they pouncing on the robe? It has sleeves!) Taking into account the specific circumstances of the participants, time and location of the crime committed, the court comes to the conclusion that the signs qualifying as hate in the name of the accused as justified. The actions of the defendants are in violation of universally recognized norms: using swear words in the immediate vicinity of the icons and relics, the invasion of the solea and pulpit, disobeying the guards... the orientation of their actions toward hate is confirmed by the spread of the video clip on the Internet, in order to bring forth insult to other Orthodox citizens. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alyokhina put themselves in opposition to people who share the Orthodox values, showing disrespect for dogma that has been observed for centuries, instead putting themselves in the spotlight, thus belittling citizens trying to communicate with God. Their vulgar actions have had a negative psycho-social impact on a group of Orthodox believers - citizens who regard themselves as connected to God. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alyokhina have claimed there were falsities in the case file. But the court has not fixed an interest on our police colleagues in the outcome of the case...
The expert who conducted the peer review was independent. The Court finds his conclusions motivated and well-founded, and fully agree with them. The examination does not contain contradictions, and no violations of the law of the Russian Federation by the court has been established. In addition, the conclusions of the examination are consistent with the testimony of victims and witnesses who confirmed the lack of political action during the protest in the church. Grounds for declaring invalid expertise is not available. In addressing the petition by the defense to call forth specialists, it was rejected because ...
The court finds the defendants' arguments that they did not intend to stir up religious hatred and hostility untenable, because it contradicted the sum total of the evidence in the case. Despite the fact that the band members of Pussy Riot say that their purpose is political, that they are against the unification of the authorities and the church, these claims are groundless. From the testimony of the victims there were no political slogans in the church, and no names of any of the politicians were uttered. They are found guilty.
Tolokonnikova has a mixed personality disorder as evidenced by her active life position, defending of social values, an elevated level of aspirations, and a tendency toward categorical expression of her opinion. The psychological traits Tolokonnikova exhibits are not accompanied by cognitive impairment, she was fully aware of her alleged actions, compulsory treatment is not needed. Samutsevich has a mixed personality disorder - a perseverance and categoricalness in asserting her opinions - and also does not require compulsory treatment. Alyokhina has signs of emotional instability personality disorder - traits such as demonstrativeness, inflated self-esteem, manipulativeness, disdain for common norms and rules, and a suicidal tendency to blackmail predominate (this was not in the text of the experts!). A tendency toward oppositional behaviors is observed...
The court takes into account the nature of the offense, the mitigating and aggravating circumstances... Tolokonnikova - without previous charges, has a minor child, positively characterized in place of work and study. Samutsevich - without previous charges, was not registered, was characterized positively in her place of residence, we recognize as mitigating. Alyokhina - without previous charges, is not registered, has a minor child, was characterized positively in her place of work and study. The court takes into account the views of the accused, and does not insist on serious punishment of the accused. But the court regards the change of category of crime to a less serious article as impossible.
VERDICT: "The Court believes that social justice can only be restored with an actual sentencing with actual imprisonment and correction for the defendants. The court decrees: Tolokonnikova is guilty under Article 213, part 2. 2 years total in the IK common facility. Samutsevich is found guilty - 2 years. Alyokhina - 2 years. The punishment is considered retroactively to March 15, 2012 for Samutsevich, while for Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina - from March 3.
Public: Shame, shame, shame
On a portable radio: Twenty-fourth - seventeen. How's it going?
Officer: Everything is now releasing people.
On a portable radio: The result is already there?
Officer: Yes.
............................................................................................................................................................................................
EngPussyRiot - collective of media activists is conducting informational support to the group Pussy Riot in English. Headquartered EngPussyRiot is in Russia, but the project involves people from all over the world. Read more...
You can help us by sharing information on social networks. Below you will find social network buttons (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). We will be very grateful if you would click on them and tell the world about what is happening in our country.
Click to viewPolozov: Three hours.
Ekaterina: Where is Violetta (lawer).
Polozov: Violetta? Violetta is fighting somewhere.
Nadezhda: Shame promoters.
Mariya: And producers.
Mariya: The death of the producers - the freedom to prisoners!
Nadezhda: Yeah.
Polozov: Which radical slogans.
Nadezhda: We will write a petition.
Mariya: Yes, we have decided that we will write a petition.
Polozov: For who?
Nadezhda: We all decided we have a collective decision. that we do not have producers and there promoters and all the people who call themselves as impostors.
Polozov: Fine.
Ekaterina: And that already appear on the network do not understand ...
Polozov: Has appeared on the network. There is a service where you can order a variety of concerts and events and the group Pussy Riot - 1 million rubles ($ 30,000).
Feigin: Fine.
woman guard: Hands remove.
Feigin: Hands remove, of course.
woman guard: Of course.
Polozov: 1 000 000 rubles one speech.
Mariya: Listen, we know who sanctioned this (handcuffs), why?
Feigin: Yes specifically bullied.
Polozov: All it's bullshit, on the sentence without handcuffs.
Feigin: Of course it's bullshit.
Polozov: But you are dangerous, the most dangerous criminals in Russia. You won even dog guards.
Ekaterina: Two dogs.
Polozov: Even the two dogs? Today, strengthening, and where the other one?
Mariya: One the most evil and the other good shepherd.
Polozov: A good police dog. Good and evil.
Mariya: Good and evil, yeah.
Polozov: Practical psychological weapon.
Mariya: Did you watch pictures of the cat? Rewrote the hut at the cat.
Polozov: yes, yes.
Mariya: it's funny?
Polozov: Yes, it's funny.
Mariya: Me too liked.
Feigin: Here are some of the people run.
Polozov: Today, there is another deputy, this time the Bundestag.
Mariya: Yes, I can see that there are foreigners.
Polozov: A Kerry McCartney who was present at the trial, already wrote Screwtape people raises London uprising.
Nadezhda: In London, the riots, because Pussy Riot :)
Feigin: Promotions are already in 35 cities.
Polozov: Already in the 60. Today Free Pussy Riot - Global Day.
Volkova: Today, the novaya gazeta came out great interview.
Ekaterina: Not let me a paper (documents) to raise here on top.
Polozov: We were allowed to pick up the documents here, they can pick up after the verdict.
Officer: Ok.
Volkova: Still not allowed visitors.
Polozov: It is not a question of the convoy.
Feigin: Who is it, Navalny?
Volkova: Navalny, guys have to go there, I'm tired of fighting. Udaltsov unbolted now do nothing. Interviews conducted.
Feigin: When the screw ?
Polozov: Always nothing. Let's go see what's there.
Feigin: Go on, I'm here to guard.
Feigin: You read a farewell call Maura?
Nadezhda: We are fools, you have not noticed.
Ekaterina: We do not read, do not know.
Feigin: Someone else has something I wrote ...
Mariya: Zizek wrote that we know. Why did not you bring.
Ekaterina: It is interesting to read what Zizek writes.
Nadezhda: Yes, very.
Ekaterina: You would lean against so ...
Nadezhda: Or in jail.
Feigin: I'll get in jail.
Woman guard: folder carry away.
Feigin: I can hide behind your dog here.
Feigin: Basically, what I'm saying. Today they just announced, tomorrow, Saturday, Sunday ... on Monday. When it will be announced, and we discuss it. Well, in general you will be condemned.
Nadezhda: Well, that's understandable.
Mariya: Thank you.
Ekaterina: Thank you.
***
The Court cannot agree with a lack of hate motive. The defendants position themselves as supporters of feminism, that is, the movement for equal rights for men and women. But the state guarantees equal rights! Belonging to feminism is not a crime, but is incompatible with Orthodoxy, Catholicism, and Islam. Although feminism is not a religion, it intrudes into areas that are significant to religion ... In the emotions and gestures of the defendants we can see hatred ... The defense mentions that the Constitution is valid throughout the Russian Federation, and because they are not attracted for the same actions by trolley or in the subway, they can't be condemned for that. The "speech" - in quotes - of the group "Pussy Riot" is not associated with a specific object ... but when moving to an Orthodox church the object changes, as it has moved into the sphere of protection of people in different areas. And in the disruption of normal routine CCS - there is only one element of disrespect to the faithful ...
The Court finds that these actions offend, inciting hatred and enmity, which contradicts the Constitution. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alekhina were obviously aware of the negative reaction to their campaign, having deliberately prepared masks with slits for eyes and mouth, and dresses. That is, this was a premeditated crime. The court considers the testimony of the defendants that they did not have a motive of hatred with distrust, as a tactic of the defense chosen to mitigate the punishment. There are no reasons not to trust the victims and witnesses. From the victims' testimony, we have learned that all the actions of the defendants and unidentified participants clearly expressed religious hatred and enmity. The victims were deeply humiliated, they suffered non-pecuniary damage. Their actions were organized for this.
The testimony of the witnesses and victims are consistent. It was observed that, in favor of the prior agreement, the night before February 21st there was a rehearsal in the Elokhovskiy Church, as well as in the back room. Tolokonnikova's discussion in preparing the action was also documented. They had agreed to conduct videotaping of the provocative actions... they withdrew the gown... (Masha's mother: "Why are they pouncing on the robe? It has sleeves!) Taking into account the specific circumstances of the participants, time and location of the crime committed, the court comes to the conclusion that the signs qualifying as hate in the name of the accused as justified. The actions of the defendants are in violation of universally recognized norms: using swear words in the immediate vicinity of the icons and relics, the invasion of the solea and pulpit, disobeying the guards... the orientation of their actions toward hate is confirmed by the spread of the video clip on the Internet, in order to bring forth insult to other Orthodox citizens. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alyokhina put themselves in opposition to people who share the Orthodox values, showing disrespect for dogma that has been observed for centuries, instead putting themselves in the spotlight, thus belittling citizens trying to communicate with God. Their vulgar actions have had a negative psycho-social impact on a group of Orthodox believers - citizens who regard themselves as connected to God. Tolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alyokhina have claimed there were falsities in the case file. But the court has not fixed an interest on our police colleagues in the outcome of the case...
The expert who conducted the peer review was independent. The Court finds his conclusions motivated and well-founded, and fully agree with them. The examination does not contain contradictions, and no violations of the law of the Russian Federation by the court has been established. In addition, the conclusions of the examination are consistent with the testimony of victims and witnesses who confirmed the lack of political action during the protest in the church. Grounds for declaring invalid expertise is not available. In addressing the petition by the defense to call forth specialists, it was rejected because ...
The court finds the defendants' arguments that they did not intend to stir up religious hatred and hostility untenable, because it contradicted the sum total of the evidence in the case. Despite the fact that the band members of Pussy Riot say that their purpose is political, that they are against the unification of the authorities and the church, these claims are groundless. From the testimony of the victims there were no political slogans in the church, and no names of any of the politicians were uttered. They are found guilty.
Tolokonnikova has a mixed personality disorder as evidenced by her active life position, defending of social values, an elevated level of aspirations, and a tendency toward categorical expression of her opinion. The psychological traits Tolokonnikova exhibits are not accompanied by cognitive impairment, she was fully aware of her alleged actions, compulsory treatment is not needed. Samutsevich has a mixed personality disorder - a perseverance and categoricalness in asserting her opinions - and also does not require compulsory treatment. Alyokhina has signs of emotional instability personality disorder - traits such as demonstrativeness, inflated self-esteem, manipulativeness, disdain for common norms and rules, and a suicidal tendency to blackmail predominate (this was not in the text of the experts!). A tendency toward oppositional behaviors is observed...
The court takes into account the nature of the offense, the mitigating and aggravating circumstances... Tolokonnikova - without previous charges, has a minor child, positively characterized in place of work and study. Samutsevich - without previous charges, was not registered, was characterized positively in her place of residence, we recognize as mitigating. Alyokhina - without previous charges, is not registered, has a minor child, was characterized positively in her place of work and study. The court takes into account the views of the accused, and does not insist on serious punishment of the accused. But the court regards the change of category of crime to a less serious article as impossible.
VERDICT: "The Court believes that social justice can only be restored with an actual sentencing with actual imprisonment and correction for the defendants. The court decrees: Tolokonnikova is guilty under Article 213, part 2. 2 years total in the IK common facility. Samutsevich is found guilty - 2 years. Alyokhina - 2 years. The punishment is considered retroactively to March 15, 2012 for Samutsevich, while for Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina - from March 3.
Public: Shame, shame, shame
On a portable radio: Twenty-fourth - seventeen. How's it going?
Officer: Everything is now releasing people.
On a portable radio: The result is already there?
Officer: Yes.
............................................................................................................................................................................................
EngPussyRiot - collective of media activists is conducting informational support to the group Pussy Riot in English. Headquartered EngPussyRiot is in Russia, but the project involves people from all over the world. Read more...
You can help us by sharing information on social networks. Below you will find social network buttons (Facebook, Twitter, etc.). We will be very grateful if you would click on them and tell the world about what is happening in our country.