Case 34 Hearing - Case 35 Accepted

[emosnail]

The ASUCD Supreme Court

CASE # 35

Laabs v. Holloway

12/06/06, accepted

WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Before: Chief Justice Fricke; Justices Harney, Aguilera, Sraboyants, & Wheat
Fricke, C.J., delivers the opinion of the Court:

I. The Prima Facie Merits of the Case
   The ASUCD Constitution, Article III § 4 ¶ 4 states in part:The President shall

Comments

[sostrowski]

You should have thrown this case out, because I haven't has a schedule meeting as of yet. I still could be confirmed before my first meeting. I also feel that I am being targeted when more powerful people on the Academic Senate haven't been confirmed either. I also feel that the the wording of the Constitution implies ASUCD committees, and that all Academic Senate representatives are desginees of the ASUCD President. In conclusion this is another Discordian effort by Laabs. I feel that in this case I should act responsible in opposing this court case.

[sostrowski]

I haven't been confirmed, I think. Considering what I was told when I applied, I should probably be a witness in that case.

Espescially if we get to go back to the Moot Court room, which had a very awesome ambieance.

This quarter my class schedule has conflicted with court meetings, so I was excited to finally see them in action. I was so enthralled by the proceedings that I missed the beginning of class. Good stuff.

[angelicheroism]

that was me, btw.

Motions

[emosnail]

I Re: "I feel that in this case I should act responsible in opposing this court case."

You can motion to be joindered as a Defendant, in accordance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedures (FRCP)(which we use as a suppliment for the many things the Judicial Codes don't cover), Rule 19a. Send an email to myself & Vice Chief Coady (or just myself if you can't find his email address.. I don't want to post it out in the public here for the savage spambots) formally motioning to be joindered to the case as a defendant.

II Re: "You should have thrown this case out, because I haven't has a schedule meeting as of yet. I still could be confirmed before my first meeting."

You can motion for a summary dismissal of the case under FRCP Rule 56. As above, send an email to myself & VCJ Coady stating the motion.

[jtleathers]

Not only did the Aggie contact me and write a front page article but they ran an editorial today too.

Meanwhile the Court gets ignored...nothing new there.