Highlights From Van Shoelace v. Senate

Apr 20, 2006 21:15


Highlights From the Case # 31 Hearing
   On Tuesday we had our hearing for Case # 31, Van Schoelandt v. ASUCD Senate. The Defence was represented by Greg "the big city lawyer" Russel, while Hanging Chad Van Shoelace represented the plaintiffs. I was taking the minutes, so of course they are excellently recorded. Due to my inability to properly ( Read more... )

case # 31, chad-sudan conflict, asucd supreme court, ari kalfayan, avi singh, people being dumb, chad van schoelandt, asucd, jonathon leathers, greg russel, mara stringfield, ampac 2006, megan cayler, daviswiki, rocwiki, thomas lloyd

Leave a comment

Comments 17

ashael April 22 2006, 10:26:02 UTC
Did you get to eat the lobsters?

Reply

emosnail April 23 2006, 08:21:54 UTC
Nah, lobsters are too cute to eat.

Reply


shid April 23 2006, 23:39:03 UTC
To read that girls nametag you would basically have to stare into her clevage.

And in the end, I still wouldn't have remembered her name, causing me to continually look at her boobs.

Reply

emosnail April 24 2006, 00:12:48 UTC
Indeed, and if the Syrian Arab Republic wasn't sitting next to his placard, you'd have to stare at his chest! or something.

Did you see the refencce to you here?

Reply

shid April 24 2006, 02:15:58 UTC
When I initially started reading that post, I saw the LJ links and stopped reading, since there was no way you would mention me. Now that I have read it, I must admit I am tempted (but as I have not posted.. in a bit... it'd be a large leap) and frankly I have 14 pages of papers to write in the next week.

If I start, it'll be after Wednesday.

Reply

emosnail April 24 2006, 02:18:17 UTC
It starts June 1st, yo.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up