Nanakul v. SGAO

Mar 08, 2006 00:58

The opinion on Nanakul v. SGAO (Case 32)- regarding the missing Student Bill of Rights - is officially out. As promised, the Student Bill of Rights is attached ( Read more... )

asucd, asucd supreme court, case # 32, sgao

Leave a comment

Comments 13

orwell_troll March 8 2006, 11:05:10 UTC
Uh, the titles need changed in that document. That said, we should all take a moment to remember the pwnage of The Aggie. Ah, a fine day for justice.

Now I'm actually going to read the new opinion.

Reply

emosnail March 8 2006, 18:21:12 UTC
Haha oops. Yeah I usually use the previous case as a template for the next one. I better fix that asap.

Reply


also anonymous March 8 2006, 11:45:26 UTC
IV. Durability of Senate Bill #48 (2003)
Senate Bill # 38 imposed substantial new duties on the Student Government Administrative Office, however it did not enter these into the bylaws.

That's something else that should be corrected, unless I am mistaken, in which case, my apologies.

-The Anonymous First Year

Reply

Re: also emosnail March 8 2006, 18:21:39 UTC
Did you mean to write 38 instead of 48? Why 38?

Reply

Re: also anonymous March 9 2006, 09:58:41 UTC
You wrote #38 in the document that you posted. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that point. I was just quoting that area.

-The Anonymous First Year

Reply

Re: also emosnail March 9 2006, 22:25:24 UTC
Oh found it, fixed.

Reply


jtleathers March 8 2006, 19:44:26 UTC
"ORDERED, that the Student Bill of Rights, if found, be made available online within a month of its discovery, or the publication of this opinion whichever occurs later."

...followed by the Student Bill of Rights. Well played. I enjoyed that.

Reply


Hehe nice libpaul March 9 2006, 05:50:51 UTC
Ya, I figured after about 2 lawsuits, its time to re-evaluate the need for my old bill :)

Its kinda funny how the new Focites largely abandoned these Bill of Rights, when it's one of their few remaining legacies...

Reply

Re: Hehe nice emosnail March 9 2006, 22:23:56 UTC
why the crap didn't you have it write something into the codes?

Reply

Re: Hehe nice libpaul March 10 2006, 03:21:53 UTC
Cuz it was my first piece of legislation ever, and I did'nt realize the importance of not writing into the codes O.o

Also, not that this should become an issue, but how did you acquire your copy of the bill of rights? Was it the exact version of what was voted on and passed?

Reply

Re: Hehe nice emosnail March 10 2006, 04:40:37 UTC
I tihnk I meant to add a disclaimer that we aren't hereby saying that htis version is the definitive version. The version attached is certified by SGAO as authentic -- we ourselves have not scrutinized it.

I think the question of the endurance of bills & resolutions beyond the year they are passed is an interesting one. Many assume they carry authority until overruled by later legislation; but if that were the case, there would be literally hundreds of these binding documents in the archives which one would be responsible for knowing, and is it really reasonable to expect ASUCD to continue to enforce all these? Maybe it is (= I think it could be argued either way.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up