Codebase

Mar 17, 2008 12:27

How committed are people to the LJ codebase ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 27

siderea March 18 2008, 01:08:35 UTC
Do multiple journals in one identity make sense when you can have multiple identities? Examples each way might be good.Multiple journals aren't as useful as the ability to "subscribe to sub-journals" i.e. "friend by tag". That is, it would be cool to be able to either friend someone in general, or friend them such that only their posts with certain tags show up in your flist. (Tagging would probably have to work differently than it does for this to be socially useful because tags aren't a controlled vocabulary; or maybe tagging should be separate from this concept and it should be called something like "subjournals" or something ( ... )

Reply

novalis March 18 2008, 01:27:09 UTC
I once spent a few days writing a RSS-based subscribe-by-tag system, and then accidentally deleted it.

I had completely forgotten about it before you mentioned it, and I'm glad that you bring it up -- it's what all those people with opt-in fgroups really want.

Reply

siderea March 18 2008, 01:47:28 UTC
I once spent a few days writing a RSS-based subscribe-by-tag system, and then accidentally deleted it.

*cries* "O HAI I WRITED U A RSS-BASED SUBSCRIBE-BY-TAG SISTM BUT I EATED IT."

I had completely forgotten about it before you mentioned it, and I'm glad that you bring it up -- it's what all those people with opt-in fgroups really want.

Precisely!

Reply


siderea March 18 2008, 01:15:00 UTC
Another big-philosophy question. Is building an LJ-code clone -- i.e. yet another centralized gated community application -- the most useful thing to be doing? I guess my question is, "What are you trying to achieve?"

Because if what you want is to escape the clutches of LJ, I have an alternative, more radical proposal: an entirely federated system, like Wordpress only, you know, LJ, that plugs right into cpanel and such like, so that companies like dreamhost can offer it. Everybody gets to run his or her own server on his or her own bill for, like $7/mo. No big targets to sue any more. No centralization leading to censorship.

Reply

siliconshaman March 18 2008, 14:38:01 UTC
Hmm...I could tailor a web-hosting package to the dist model. Bundle in a sub-domain name that's the same as the journal and that might solve some of the problems...

Reply

siderea March 18 2008, 21:37:19 UTC
Hmm...I could tailor a web-hosting package to the dist model.

Yes! Yes, you could! Part of my vision is how to make this not merely possible, but, you know, good business sense for someone. And "hosting companies" was the obvious answer. LJDist could be yet another feature that hosting companies package and sell as part of their services. They provide it because it attracts business, and people buy it because they can.

(I'm sorry, I'm going to have to share this idea with other hosting companies, you know. :)

Reply

siliconshaman March 18 2008, 21:45:24 UTC
That's ok... it's a good idea and the web is big enough for plenty of others.

Reply


siliconshaman March 18 2008, 14:29:43 UTC
Ah, oops...I think I should have posted here... oh well. There's an entry after this you might want to look at. I can put together a hosting package for elsejournal. But I don't really have the time or skills to do more than donate resources, so someone else will have to do the coding.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up