the angels and the devils are within us

[ella_menno]

HELLO INTERNETS I HAVE MISSED YOOOOOOOOOOU!!

Yeah, so, a little trouble with the connectivity earlier this week. Hmph.

Item the first:

Comments

I love it!

[katelennon]

This technicality soul stuff is teh awesome!

If Sam was "brought" back with additional bits, ie, evil/demony extras, could one conclude that Dean's Sam was not brought back and thus the terms of the original bargain were not met? Remember- Dean wanted "Sam" back from the dead. Could the addition of him being back 'wrong' (which, btw is sooo Buffy, it makes me a little cranksy)be enough of a failure to meet the contractual obligation as set out in the original agreement to invalidate said agreement?

I love technicalities.

Re: I love it!

[ella_menno]

Mmmm, technicalities. I bet they taste like chicken.

Could the addition of him being back 'wrong' [snip] be enough of a failure to meet the contractual obligation as set out in the original agreement to invalidate said agreement?

This? Is the kind of thoughtful, introspective, meta-tastic stuff someone OUGHT to be writing. Now we just have to figure out who that person is. Harumph.

I vote you. I can't write, but I plot very, very well..

[katelennon]

Y'know, the more I think about this, the more I think that if Dean can prove that Sam was not in fact, the original Sam, that this might actually be a very convincing argument. However, to whom would he appeal? Obviously the cross-toards demon is prejudiced; is there a bi-annual meeting of an impartial group that would listen to his complaint? Should there be one? It would actually be beneficial to both parties where there an independent governing body.