MPAA vs. Fandom

Feb 26, 2005 10:54

Oh you gotta see thisApparently the MPAA has decided that one particular slash website is illegally using their trademarked "NC=17" label--and has sent the owner a Cease & Desist order ( Read more... )

fandom, notable news, linguistics, ow ow ow make it stop

Leave a comment

Comments 6

terpsichoros February 26 2005, 19:22:28 UTC
The MPAA created the NC-17 label because it hadn't defended its trademark on "X" as a movie rating. I suspect that the site in question might have a case if it does not have movies, though I think the MPAA would have a very good case against any site which uses G, PG, PG-13, R, or NC-17 for movie clips which have not been rated by the MPAA. The case would be weaker for images and text content only.

Reply

terpsichoros February 26 2005, 19:35:05 UTC
The MPAA also has the argument that "X" rating is not trademarked, and thus is available for use by anyone who wants it; while the NC-17 rating was specifically intended to replace "X" as the trademark had been lost.

Reply

elfwreck February 27 2005, 06:21:20 UTC
The site in question doesn't have movies. Text stories, maybe artwork.

They sent a note to one particular site... but not fanfiction.net, or skyhawke.com, or any of dozens of other fanfic sites.

They might have *something* of a case, if it hadn't been common for fanfic for about 10 years. Trademark rights are something you lose if you don't defend them. (Especially when they're something as simple as a letter-code. Hm. I wonder if they've already lost G, PG & R for text things because people have been using them, at least casually, in reference to comic books for a long time.)

I'm not even sure they could defend it for movie clips... a quick google turns up several fanfic sites with flash movies with standard MPAA ratings.

Reply


anarchys_savior February 26 2005, 19:49:52 UTC
Hahahahahaha!!!!

They're just now noticing??? Wow. I'm not even into fanfiction that much but I still knew about it.

Reply


happydog February 27 2005, 09:36:50 UTC
somebody's lawyer was bored, I guess?

Reply


spazzychic March 9 2005, 00:47:54 UTC

That *IS* amusing. I wonder what legal mire *THAT*'s going to crawl into? For the most part, the site owners are just going to panic and change it most likely...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up