I have a sneaking suspicion that things weren't like that a few centuries ago, either. (The distribution of roles, maybe, but not the real underlying structure. When you're used to getting knocked around the planet, you know how to rely on your full talent pool, whatever titles you give them. I haven't met any genuinely patriarchal Ashkenazi family, in any denomination, that wasn't making a serious modern-day effort to be that way.)
The comments that got me were these two, by fotheringay-phipps:
"I myself think girls learn too much in school, and am inclined to send my daughter to a HS that teaches less, not more. Reason: I just don't think it is a priority. I don't see any reason to make the poor girl spend a lot of time studying for tests and doing enormous amounts of homework for something that is not put forth as a priority in traditional Jewish sources. Let her grow up with good midos and yiras shomayim."
"Unfortunately, the trend these days is for girls to learn more, not less, and you can't go against the flow. I would prefer that my daughter go to a school that taught less, as above, but I don't want her to go to a school of academic dropouts. I would prefer a school with fine girls who (or whose parents) also did not view learning as such a priority."
In case you missed it: He would prefer that his daughter go to a school that taught less, so that she wouldn't learn too much.
If all you want your daughter to do is grow up to marry young, and be a good, obedient, baby factory, why bother putting her through all the trouble of a rigorous education? They have a point. It's the premise that's disturbing.
I don't think you realize the schedule of these schools. They are set up to train all students into becoming rabbis, even though they are not particularly successful. Kids as young as second grade come home from school at 5pm and then start homework. A little less intensiveness might be a good thing for all kids, and understandably for girls who are not expected to become talmud scholars.
In addition to what was said regarding women -- "As we discussed in regard to converts, neither they nor women may be appointed to positions of communal authority." Converts can't be appointed to positions of communal authority? One what grounds?
It's footnoted to Contemporary Halachic Problems, vol 2. If the whole serarah issue is claimed to be of Biblical origin (which it seems to be), I'll bet it's based on a misunderstanding of the word גר (modern/rabbinic Hebrew: convert, biblical hebrew: stranger), but, I haven't read the source, so, don't quote me on it.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
"I myself think girls learn too much in school, and am inclined to send my daughter to a HS that teaches less, not more. Reason: I just don't think it is a priority. I don't see any reason to make the poor girl spend a lot of time studying for tests and doing enormous amounts of homework for something that is not put forth as a priority in traditional Jewish sources. Let her grow up with good midos and yiras shomayim."
"Unfortunately, the trend these days is for girls to learn more, not less, and you can't go against the flow. I would prefer that my daughter go to a school that taught less, as above, but I don't want her to go to a school of academic dropouts. I would prefer a school with fine girls who (or whose parents) also did not view learning as such a priority."
In case you missed it: He would prefer that his daughter go to a school that taught less, so that she wouldn't learn too much.
Is this Bizaro World?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment