Curious

Feb 02, 2014 09:06

The photograph below, discovered by Lancashire researcher Robert Haley in a private Scottish collection, has the words "Les soeurs Brontë, Londres" written on the back. Is this a portrait of the Brontë sisters?


Read more... )

brontes

Leave a comment

Comments 8

karmaku February 2 2014, 16:02:02 UTC
Fascinating! Thank you so much for sharing this.

Reply

eldritchhobbit February 12 2014, 18:01:40 UTC
My pleasure! I thought it was amazing (and I was surprised I hadn't heard about it before now).

Reply


peadarog February 2 2014, 16:41:33 UTC
How cool! No matter what the outcome is...

Reply

eldritchhobbit February 12 2014, 18:02:01 UTC
Yes! That's what I thought, too.

Reply


methylviolet10b February 2 2014, 17:54:21 UTC
OooooOOooOOOoo!!! It's a wonderful image. I would dearly love it to be a picture of the Bronte sisters, which makes me automatically suspicious (too good to be true!). That being said, the website you link to is fascinating. It is certainly not outside the realm of possibility that this photograph (okay, copy of a daguerreotype) is in fact what it purports to be.

Ooo. :-D

Almost entirely (but not quite) unrelated: have you seen any of the Pre-Raphaelite photography? There was a show at the national gallery a few years back, and at least one nice book... Early photography is fascinating stuff. (And some of the methods used to do it were amazingly toxic, but that's another subject entirely.)

Reply

eldritchhobbit February 12 2014, 18:05:11 UTC
I'm with you: I'd love it to be the real thing! And there's enough evidence to make it a compelling possibility worthy of investigation. It's clearly not some simple prank, for example.

Ooooh, that link to the Pre-Raphaelite photography is fantastic! Thanks for the heads up. I need to get my hands on the book related to that show. It looks fascinating.

Reply


ext_1452293 February 8 2014, 18:23:48 UTC
So interesting! I love this kind of stuff.

"If these are the Brontë sisters, the original photo must have been taken before Emily died in 1848. "

Why before? ;) It could be a convincingly life-like post-mortem daguerreotype (by far, my favorite type of daguerreotype). :D

Reply

eldritchhobbit February 12 2014, 18:05:55 UTC
Why before? ;) It could be a convincingly life-like post-mortem daguerreotype (by far, my favorite type of daguerreotype). :D

Once again, you remind me why you're one of my favorite people. :D

Yes. This.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up